Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Roadway horizontal curves are the site of numerous crashes and motorist deaths each year. The objective of this study was to determine the most effective curve warning device using on-road performance and subjective evaluation. A baseline no warning condition and two multi-modal warnings were tested by 48 participants at the Virginia Smart Road closed test highway. Both warnings exhibited the same auditory (speech) and visual (Heads-Down Display) stimuli, but one also included a throttle push-back haptic stimulus. Throttle reaction times and brake reaction times were significantly quicker and curve entry speed significantly closer to an advisory speed for participants receiving a warning presentation versus those without a warning presentation. Older drivers reached more appropriate curve entry speeds than younger drivers. Driver risk-taking style was significantly related to age and curve entry speed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Charlton

S. G.

(2004). Perceptual and attentional effects on drivers speed selection at curves. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(5), 877–884.

Comte

S. L.

Jamson

A. H.

(2000). Traditional and Innovative Speed-Reducing Measures for Curves: An Investigation of Driver Behavior Using a Driving Simulator. Safety Science, 36, 137–150.

Dingus

T. A.

McGehee

N. M.

Jahns

S. K.

Carney

Hankey

J. M.

(1997). Human Factors Field Evaluation of Automotive Headway Maintenance/Collision Warning Devices. Human Factors, 39(2), 216–229.

Hanowski

R. J.

Dingus

T. A.

Gallagher

J. P.

Kieliszewski

C. A.

Neale

V. L.

(1999). Driver response to in-vehicle warnings. Transportation Human Factors, 1(1), 91–106.

Iversen

(2004). Risk-Taking Attitudes and Risky Driving Behaviour. Transportation Research Part F, 7, 135–150.

Janssen

Nilsson

(1993). Behavioral Effects of Driver Support. In Parkes

A. M.

Franzen

Driving Future Vehicles. 147–155: Taylor & Francis.

Lee

J. D.

Gore

B. F.

Campbell

J. L.

(1999). Display Alternatives for In-Vehicle Warning and Sign Information: Message Style, Location, and Modality. Transportation Human Factors, 1(4), 347–375.

Manser

M. P.

Ward

N. J.

Kuge

Boer

E. R.

(2004). Influence of a Driver Support System on Situation Awareness and Information Processing in Response to Lead Vehicle Braking. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, 2359–2363.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2004). Fatality Analysis Reporting System Web-Based Encyclopedia. Retrieved July 6, 2004, from http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/.

10.

Neurauter

M. L.

(2004). Multidimensional Warnings: Determining an Appropriate Combination for a Curve Warning Device. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

11.

Neurauter

M. L.

(2005). Multimodal Warnings: Curve- Warning Design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 1945–1949.

12.

Uno

Hiramatsu

(2001). Collision Avoidance Capabilities of Older Drivers and Improvement by Warning Presentation. Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper Number 185.

13.

Wogalter

M. S.

Conzola

V. C.

Smith-Jackson

T. L.

(2002). Research-Based Guidelines for Warning Design and Evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 219–230.

On-Road Evaluation of an In-Vehicle Curve Warning Device

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References