Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Appropriate protocols are necessary for assessing the distraction potential of in-vehicle tasks and devices. The AAM (Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers) has proposed the “Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems” (AAM, 2003). The purpose of the present study was to assess the utility of one specific method, the Occlusion Method (as outlined by Principle 2.1 of the AAM Guidelines) by applying it to four navigation systems available in current production vehicles. This method was used to assess the distraction potential for 16 participants as they completed navigation-related tasks involving visual display and manual controls. The results provide evidence that the Total Shutter Open Time (TSOT) measure from the Occlusion Task is a promising method for discriminating between different task types and complexity levels of these tasks as well as between different telematics systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (2003). Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems. Washington, D. C. Version 3.0. June 17, 2003.

EEC. (1999). Commission Recommendation of 21 December 1999 on safe and efficient in-vehicle information and communication systems: A European statement of principles on human machine interfaces, official Journal of the European Communities L 19/64, 25.1.2000. European Commission DGXIII, Brussels.

ISO/TC22/SC13/WG8 N229 (2005). Road Vehicles – Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems – Occlusion method to assess visual distraction due to the use of in-vehicle information and communication systems. Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 16673.

Japanese Automobile Manufacturers (2005) Guideline for In-vehicle Display Systems – JAMA Version 3, English Version.

Johansson

Carsten

Janssen

Jamson

Ostlund

Brouwer

Mouta

Harbluk

Antilla

Sandberg

Luoma

(2004). HASTE Deliverable 3: Validation of the HASTE protocol specification.

Monk

C. A.

Boehm-Davis

D. A.

Trafton

J. G.

(2004) Recovering from interruptions: Implications for driver distraction research. Human Factors, 46 (4), 650–663.

NHTSA (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk. Available at: http://wwwnrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/PDF/DriverInattention.pdf.

Senders

J. W.

Kristofferson

A. B.

Levison

Dietrich

C. W.

Ward

J. L.

(1966). An investigation of driver information processing (No.1335). U. S. Department of Commerce.

Translucent Technologies (2006). http://home.ca.inter.net/∼milgram/ .

The Occlusion Procedure for Assessing in-Vehicle Telematics: Tests of Current Vehicle Systems

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References