Anr vs. Passive Communications Headsets: Investigation of Speech Intelligibility,Pilot Workload,and Flight Performance in an Aircraft Simulator

Abstract

Cockpits of propeller-driven aircraft are often environments of high amplitude, low frequency-dominant engine noise. This noise can interfere with radio communications. Previous authors have examined the effect of active noise reduction (ANR) headsets on speech intelligibility in noise in the absence of the attentional demand from simultaneously-performed complex tasks such as flying an airplane. This experiment investigated the combined effects of various headsets (passive and ANR) on speech intelligibility, mental workload and flight performance in an aircraft simulator. Instrument-rated pilots were tasked with completing four 3.5-hour cross-country flight simulations, one for each of 4 headsets. Results indicated that ANR headsets (as a group) generally improved speech intelligibility and decreased mental workload over a passive headset; however, flight performance results showed a more complex relationship. One conclusion is that a well-designed ANR headset has measurable benefits as a tool to potentially improve pilot performance by fostering safer operations within aviation systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

B.W.

Garinther

G.R.

(1997). Effects of active noise reduction in armor crew headsets. In AGARD conference proceedings (pp. 20-1–20-6). Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France: AGARD.

Casali

J.G.

(1989). Multiple factors effect speech communication in the workplace. Occupational Safety and Health, 58, 32–42.

Connell

L.J.

Reynard

W.D.

(1993). Emergency medical service helicopter incidents reported to the aviation safety reporting system. International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH.

Gower

D.W.

Casali

J.G.

(1994). Speech intelligibility and protective effectiveness of selected active noise reduction and conventional communications headsets. Human Factors, 36(2), 350–367.

James

(2004). Defining the cockpit noise hazard, hearing damage risk and the benefits Active Noise Reduction headsets can provide. In Personal Hearing Protection Including Active Noise Reduction, NATO RTO Lecture Series HFM-111, pg 12.

Kryter

K.D.

(1974). The Effects of Noise on Man. Orlando: Academic Press.

McKinley

R.L.

Nixon

C.W.

(1993)Active noise reduction headsets. In Noise & Man ′93: Noise as a Public Health Problem, volume 2 (pp. 83–86). Actes INRETS No 34, Arcueil, France.

Steeneken

H.J.M.

Houtgast

(1980). A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 318–326.

Van Wijngaarden

S.J.

Rots

(2001). Balancing speech intelligibility versus sound exposure in selection of personal hearing protection equipment for Chinook aircrews. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72, 1037–1044.

10.

Wagstaff

A.S.

Woxen

O.J.

(2001). Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility — Room for improvement. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72, 400–404.

11.

Whitaker

Peters

Garinther

(1989). Tank crew performance: Effects of speech intelligibility on target acquisition and subjective workload assessment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (pp. 1411–1413). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

12.

Whitaker

L. A

(1991). Performance as a function of communication in military vehicle simulators. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (pp. 614–617). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

13.

Whitaker

L. A.

Peters

L. J.

(1993). Communication between crews: The effects of speech intelligibility on team performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (pp. 630–634). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.