The Magnitude of Motion Parallax Affects Control of Egospeed

Abstract

Perceiving the speed of self-motion, or egospeed, from optical flow can be important for vehicular control. McDevitt, Eggleston, & Dyre (1999) found that judgments of egospeed are affected by the magnitude of motion parallax present in optical flow. The present study examined whether this motion parallax effect generalizes to control of egospeed. Participants were shown simulations of forward translation parallel to a set of three transparent planes defined by white dots and separated by a constant interplane distance. After a preview period, the motion parallax produced by the set of three planes was instantaneously changed by changing the interplane distance. Participants then reduced their egospeed to one-half that experienced during the preview period. Decreases in motion parallax resulted in higher adjusted speeds, while increases in motion parallax resulted in lower adjusted speeds. These results suggest that control of egospeed is affected by motion parallax in the same manner as judgments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atchley

Andersen

G. J.

(1995). Discrimination of speed distributions: Sensitivity to statistical properties. Vision Research 35 (22), 3131–3144.

Ballard

T. G.

Roach

Dyre

B. P.

(1998). Use of global optical flow rate and discontinuity rate depends on their validity as determinants of egospeed. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1, 1540–1544.

Creem

S. H.

Proffit

D. R.

(1998). Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5, 1, 22–36.

Denton

G. G.

(1980). The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed. Perception, 9, 393–402.

Dyre

B. P.

(1997). Perception of accelerating self-motion: Global optical flow rate dominates discontinuity rate. Proceedings of the 41^st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1333–1337.

Dyre

B. P.

Grimes

J. G.

(2006). ViEWER: A Virtual Environment Workbench for Education and Research. http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/∼bdyre/viewer.htm.

Goodale Milner (1995). The visual brain in action. New York Oxford University Press.

Larish

J. F.

Flach

J. M.

(1990). Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 529–532.

McDevitt

J. R.

Eggleston

Dyre

B. P.

(1999). Perception of egospeed from absolute and relative motion. In Proceedings of the 43nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1280–1284.

10.

Schaudt

W. A.

Caufield

Dyre

B. P.

(2002). Effects of a Virtual Air Speed Error Indicator on Guidance Accuracy and Eye Movement Control During Simulated Flight. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1594–1598.

11.

Servos

Carnahan

Fedwick

(2000). The visuomotor system resists the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(4), 400–404.

12.

Warren

(1982). Optical transformations during movement: Review of the optical concomitants of egomotion (Tech. Rep. AFOSR-TR-82-11028). Washington, DC: Air Force Office of Scientific Research. (NTIS No. AD-A122 275).