Active Regulation of Speed during a Simulated Low-Altitude Flight Task

Abstract

This study examined active regulation of speed during a low-altitude flight task as a function of global optical flow rate, speed, and the presence or absence of a concurrent altitude disturbance. The results showed that altitude clearly had an impact on speed control. Control of speed was much more difficult when altitude disturbances were present. Even in the no altitude disturbance conditions, performance tended to be best at lower altitudes. Consistent with previous research, the results suggest that speed and altitude changes have additive effects on speed judgments. This is inconsistent with the simple global optical flow rate hypothesis that had suggested multiplicative effects. However, it is consistent with the general notion that judgments of self motion are based on properties of optical flow fields (i.e. angles and angular rates) that depend on distance and motion relative to textured surfaces.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ballard

T.G.

Roach

Dyre

B.P.

(1998). Use of global optical flow rates depends on their validity as determinants of ego-speed. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1440–1444.

Denton

G.G.

(1980). The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed. Perception, 9, 393–402.

Dyre

B.P.

(1997). Perception of accelerating self-motion: Global optical flow rate dominates discontinuity rate. Proceedings of the 41^st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1333–1337.

Flach

J.M.

Hagen

B.A.

Larish

J.F.

(1992). Active regulation of altitude as a function of optical texture. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 557–568.

Flach

J.M.

Smith

M.R.H.

Stanard

Dittman

S.M.

(2004). Collisions: Getting them under control. In Hecht

Savelsbergh

(Eds.). Time-to-Contact. (p. 67–91). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Flach

J.M.

Warren

(1995). Low altitude flight. In Hancock

Flach

J. M.

Caird

Vicente

K.J.

(Eds.), Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems (65–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Johnson

W.W.

Phatak

A.V.

(1990). Modeling the pilot in visually controlled flight. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 10(4), 24–26.

Junaid

A.A.

Flach

J.M.

Warren

(2004). Judgments of speed of self-motion: Modeling the relative effects of speed and altitude change. Proceedings of the 48^th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society..

Langeweische

(1944). Stick and Rudder. New York: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Larish

J.F.

Flach

J.M.

(1990). Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 295–302.

11.

Owen

D. H.

Wolpert

(1984). Effects of optical flow acceleration, edge acceleration, and viewing time on the perception of egospeed. In Owen

D. H.

(Ed), Optical flow and texture variables useful in detecting decelerating and accelerating self-motion. (Interim technical report for Contract No. F33615–83–K-0038, task 2313–T3, pp. 79–133). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Aviation Psychology Laboratory.

12.

Patrick

D.L.

Flach

J.M.

Jacques

P.F.

(2003). Ambiguities in global optical flow: Tuning in to speed and altitude changes. Proceedings of the 12^th Symposium of Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH: Wright State University.

13.

Smith

M.R.H.

Flach

J.M.

Dittman

S.M.

Stanard

(2001). Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 395–410.

14.

Warren

(1982). Optical Transformations during movement: review of the optical concomitants of egomotion. (NTIS Tech Rep. No. AD-A122275). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, Department of Psychology.