Macroergonomic Principles of Automated Performance Measurement

Abstract

Retail associate productivity has increased dramatically over the last 15 years with the use of ever more sophisticated scanners and point of sale (POS) terminals. Data warehouses enable businesses to store remarkable detail about each transaction. Analyses of these data tend to focus on the items sold and money collected. However, if these systems also collect timestamp data of important events during transactions retailers would then have the basis for measuring associate activity.

This paper discusses the macroergonomic principles that must guide the design of cashier performance measurement systems in the retail setting. Following these guidelines leads not only to increased manager effectiveness, but also to more accurate measurement of activity. It can also improve associates morale and the likelihood of incenting desirable and productive behaviors. These principles are generalizable to other domains in which automated performance measurement takes place.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

UDS Green Industry Software, Inc, (n.d.). Associate accounting. Retrieved Oct. 25, 2005, from ActiveApplications Web site: http://udsgis.com/associate_accounting.htm.

Colter

(1999). Performance Evaluations: Continuing Education Module, Boulder, CO, New Hope Institute of Retailing: 1–8.

Dunsker

(2003). Manager and associate response to CMRS. NCR Internal Report.

Hitchcock

Haines

(2004). “Integrating ergonomics in the design process a practical case study.” The Design Journal 7(3): 50–60.

Home depot reengineers front-end capabilities. (2003). Retrieved Oct. 24, 2005, from 360Commerce Web site: http://www.360commerce.com/display.php/prt/y/tid/I24.html.

Huffman

J.A.

Lehman

K.R

(1997) Pointing devices in the retail environment. Proceedings of the Human factors and Ergonomics Society 41th Annual Meeting. 415–419.

Inderrieden

(1995). The silent evolution of checkstand design. Proceedings of the ′95 Behavioral Sciences Conference, AT&T Bell Labs..

Lehman

K. R.

Marras

W. S.

(1994). The effects of human interface design on wrist biomechanics during scanning. Proceedings of the Human factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting. 616–620.

Winnemuller

Russell

(2003). Ergonomic Evaluation of Grocery Checkstands, University of Washington - Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences: 1–26.