Computer Based Training and Multimedia Design: The Role of Spatial Aptitudes in Learning

Abstract

The present study manipulated both the technology (Microsoft PowerPoint® versus Macromedia Director®) and the design (Text Priming versus No Text Priming) in a computed-based training multimedia environment. The study investigated trainees' spatial aptitude and how it interacted with computer-based training design. The specific computer-based training environment employed in this experiment was based on presenting the principles of flight to naïve participants. A multifaceted knowledge test was developed to assess different levels of knowledge integration. Overall, results suggest that technology type did not play an important role in knowledge acquisition. Priming type also did not show significant effects; however, when factoring trainees' spatial ability, significant aptitude-treatment interactions emerged. We discuss these findings as they relate to computer-based training multimedia paradigms.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cuevas

H. M.

Fiore

S. M.

Oser

R. L.

(2002). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments. Instructional Science, 30, 433–464.

Fiore

S. M.

Cuevas

H. M.

Oser

R. L.

(2003). A picture is worth a thousand connections: The facilitative effects of diagrams on task performance and mental model development. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 185–199.

Guilford

J. P.

Zimmerman

W. S.

(1981). Manual of instructions and interpretations for the Guilford-Zimmerman Aptitude Survey (revised edition). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.

Hegarty

Carpenter

P. A.

Just

M. A.

(1996). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In Barr

Kamil

(Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 2, (pp. 641–648). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Jeppesen Sanderson Training Systems. (1996). Jeppesen Sanderson Private Pilot Exercise Book (8th ed.). Englewood, CO: Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.

Jeppesen Sanderson Training Systems. (1996). Jeppesen Sanderson Private Pilot Maneuvers Manual (6th ed.). Englewood, CO: Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.

Jeppesen Sanderson Training Systems. (1996). Jeppesen Sanderson Private Pilot Manual (15th ed.). Englewood, CO: Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.

Kalyuga

Chandler

Sweller

(1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–371.

Marcus

Cooper

Sweller

(1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49–63.

10.

Mayer

R. E.

(2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Mayer

R. E.

Sims

V. K.

(1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401.

12.

Pollock

Chandler

Sweller

(2002) Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61–86.

13.

Scielzo

Fiore

S. M.

Cuevas

H. M.

(2004). Understanding redundancy in multimedia design: Towards a two-stage model of cognitive load. Proceedings of the 1st Annual UCF Graduate Research Forum, 20. Orlando, FL: UCF.

14.

Sweller

(1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.

15.

Sweller

(1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.

16.

Sweller

Chandler

(1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.