Evaluating the Use of Flowsheets in Pediatric Intensive Care to Inform Design

Abstract

Flowsheets are central artifacts of information collection and exchange to support the monitoring and diagnosis of patient status in the pediatric intensive care unit. This study used field observations to examine the design and use of flowsheets. Strengths of the current paper document include portability, bundling of related data, and allowing for notes and annotations. However, the static nature of the paper document requires that users manually calculate and carry over important trends and relationships. Spatial constraints of the paper document make it necessary to squeeze data into a small space with data sometimes being difficult to read. Electronic flowsheets have the potential to overcome these limitations and introduce new features, but depending on their design, may eliminate the strengths of the original system. Studying actual practices in the work environment yielded insight into the use of the document to inform the design of an electronic flowsheet system.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ash

J.S.

Berg

Coiera

(2004). Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. J. Am Med Inform Assoc., 11, 104–112.

Berg

(1996). Practices of reading and writing: The constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociol Health Illness, 18(4), 499–524.

Brown

P.J.

Borowitz

S.M.

Novicoff

(2004). Information Exchange in the NICU: What Sources of Patient Data do Physicians Prefer to Use? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73(4), 349–355.

Gordon

Ash

Lavelle

Lyman

Delcambre

Maier

Weaver

Bowers

(2001). Bundles in the wild: Managing information to solve problems and maintain situational awareness. Library Trends, 49(2), 266–289.

Hajdukiewicz

J.R.

Burns

C.M.

Vicente

K.J.

Eggleston

R.G.

(1999). Work domain analysis for intentional systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43^rd Annual Meeting, Houston, TX: HFES.

Hajdukiewicz

J.R.

Vicente

K.J.

Doyle

D.J.

Milgram

Burns

C.M.

(2001). Modeling a medical environment: An ontology for integrated medical informatics design. Int. J. of Medical Informatics, 62(1), 79–99.

Horsky

Zhang

J.J.

Patel

V.L.

(2005). To err is not entirely human: Complex technology and user cognition. J. of Biomedical Informatics, 38(4), 264–266.

Hutchins (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Miller

Sanderson

(2005). Clinical information use by medical and nursing staff in the ICU: Outcomes of a coded table analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49^th Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL: HFES.

10.

Munir

S.K.

Kay

(2005). Simplifying the complexity surrounding ICU work processes—Identifying the scope for information management in ICU settings. Int. J. of Medical Informatics, 74(8), 643–656.

11.

Nemeth

C.P.

Cook

R.I.

O'Connor

Klock

P.A.

(2004). Using cognitive artifacts to understand distributed cognition. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 34(6), 726–735.

12.

Sharp

T.D.

Helmicki

A.J.

(1998). The application of the ecological interface design approach to neonatal intensive care medicine. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42^nd Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL: HFES.

13.

Vicente

K. J.

(1999) Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-based Work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

14.

Zhang

Norman

(1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.