Assisting Interruption Recovery in Supervisory Control of Multiple Uavs

Abstract

Performance degradation due to interruptions is a critical issue, particularly when people are supervising highly autonomous systems in time and safety critical environments. Previous research in the development of automated support to help supervisory control operators resume task activities after an interruption has had limited success. This paper describes two new interruption recovery approaches that attempt to mitigate the disadvantages of previous approaches. In particular, this paper describes the design and initial investigation of a prototype assistive interface developed to support interruption recovery for supervisory control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These two ‘replay’-type interruption recovery approaches enable increased user-control of the event discovery process and provide event ‘bookmarks’ to highlight emergent system events. The findings from this initial study provide several recommendations for the future design of interruption assistance tools for human supervisory control tasks.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmann

E.M.

Trafton

J.G.

(2004). Task interruption: Resumption lag and the role of cues. In Proceedings of CogSci 2004: 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society., Conference.

Bailey

B.P.

Konstan

J.A.

Carlis

J.V.

(2001). The effects of interruptions on task performance, annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface. In Proceedings of INTERACT 2001: IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Conference, pp. 593–601.

Cummings

M.L.

Mitchell

P.J.

(accepted). Automated Scheduling Decision Support for Supervisory Control of Multiple UAVs. AIAA Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication.

Czerwinski

Cutrell

Horvitz

(2000). Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. In Proceedings of OZCHI 2000: Conference for the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of the Ergonomics Society of Australia, Conference, pp. 356–361.

Loukopoulos

L.D.

Dismukes

R.K.

Barshi

(2001). Cockpit interruptions and distractions: A line observation study. In Proceedings of thPe 11th International Symposium on Aviation sychology, Conference, Columbus, OH, Ohio State University Press.

McFarlane

D.C.

(1999). Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of INTERACT′99: 7th IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Conference, Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp. 295–303.

St. John

Smallman

H.S.

Manes

D.I.

(2005). Recovery from Interruptions to a Dynamic Monitoring Task: the Beguiling Utility of Instant Replay. In Proceedings of HFES 2005: 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Conference, Santa Monica, CA., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 473–477.