Using Relative Position and Temporal Judgments to Assess the Effects of Texture and Field of View on Spatial Awareness for Synthetic Vision Systems Displays

Abstract

Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) depict computer generated views of terrain surrounding an aircraft. In the assessment of textures and field of view (FOV) for SVS, no studies have directly measured the 3 levels of spatial awareness: identification of terrain, its relative spatial location, and its relative temporal location. This work introduced spatial awareness measures and used them to evaluate texture and FOV in SVS displays. Eighteen pilots made 4 judgments (relative angle, distance, height, and abeam time) regarding the location of terrain points displayed in 112 5-second, non-interactive simulations of a SVS heads down display. Texture produced significant main effects and trends for the magnitude of error in the relative distance, angle, and abeam time judgments. FOV was significant for the directional magnitude of error in the relative distance, angle, and height judgments. Pilots also provided subjective terrain awareness ratings that were compared with the judgment based measures. The study found that elevation fishnet, photo fishnet, and photo elevation fishnet textures best supported spatial awareness for both the judgments and the subjective awareness measures.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

A. L.

Wickens

Hardy

T. J.

(2003). Examining the effects of guidance symbology, display size, and field of view on flight performance and situation awareness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47^th Annual Meeting. Denver, CO.

Arthur

J. J.

Prinzel

L. J.

III Kramer

L. J.

Parrish

R. V.

Bailey

R. E.

(2004) Flight simulator evaluation of synthetic vision display concepts to prevent controlled flight into terrain (CFIT). NASA Technical Report NASA/TP-2004-213008.

Boeing Commercial Airplanes. (2005, May). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: World wide operations 1959 – 2004. Aviation Safety. Retrieved August 1, 2005 from World Wide Web: http://www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf.

Bolton

(2006). An Investigation of the Effects of Texture and Field of View on Spatial Awareness in Synthetic Vision Head-down Displays. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

Bolton

M. L.

Bass

E. J.

Comstock

J. R.

(2006). A toolset to support the development of spatial and temporal judgment experiments for synthetic vision systems. 2006 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium. April 28, 2006, Charlottesville, VA.

Brace

Kemp

Snelgar

(2003) SPSS for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Comstock

J. R.

Glaab

L. J.

Prinzel

L. J.

Elliott

D. M.

(2002). Can effective synthetic vision system displays be implemented on limited size display spaces? Proceedings of the 11^th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Dayton, Ohio: The Ohio State University.

Flight Safety Foundation. (1999). Killers in aviation: LFSF task force presents facts about approach-and-landing and controlled-flight-into-terrain accidents. Eurocontrol. Retrieved August 1, 2005.

Gibson

J. J.

(1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

10.

Glaab

L. J.

Hughes

M. F.

(2003). Terrain portrayal for head-down displays flight test. Proceedings of the 22^nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Indianapolis, Indiana.

11.

Goldstein

E. B.

(2002). Sensation and perception. 6th ed. Pacific Grove: Wadsworth Group.

12.

Hughes

M. F.

Takallu

M. A.

(2002). Terrain portrayal for head-down displays experiment. Proceedings of the International Advanced Aviation Conference..

13.

McGreevy

M. W.

Ellis

S. R.

(1986). The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments. Human Factors, 28(4), 439–456.

14.

Schnell

Lemos

(2002). Terrain sampling density and texture requirements for synthetic vision systems. Rockwell Collins Final Report. Cedar Rapids, IA: Rockwell Collins.

15.

Stevens

J. P.

(2002) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

16.

Takallu

M. A.

Wong

D.T.

Bartolone

A.P.

Hughes

M.F.

Glaab

L.J.

(2004). Interaction between various terrain portrayals and guidance/tunnel symbology concepts for general aviation synthetic vision displays during a low en-route scenario. Proceeds of the 2004 Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). Salt Lake City, UT.

17.

Wickens

C. D.

(2002). Spatial awareness biases. NASA Technical Report ARL-02-6/NASA-02-4.

18.

Yeh

(1992). Spatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays. Human Factors, 34(5), 583–600.