Assessing and Enhancing Team Training Technologies: From the Lab to the Field

Abstract

The primary goal of any training system is to enhance performance on the real world tasks it simulates (Lathan et al., 2002). The principal benefit that Virtual Environment (VE) systems have over field exercises and similar real world training is that VEs present training situations that would be too hazardous or too costly to reproduce in the real world (Rose, Attree, Brooks, Parslow, Penn & Ambihaipahan, 2000). As compared with Legacy type systems or physical mockups VEs also afford a smaller footprint and greater reconfigurability to support a variety of training tasks (Cohn, Helmick, Meyers & Burns, 2000). An additional, relatively unexplored benefit of VE, is the potential ease with which they can be implemented to train team tasks. This panel will investigate the utility of using VE for team training, addressing both theoretical and practical concerns.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brooks

B. M.

Attree

E. A.

Rose

F. D.

Clifford

B. R.

Leadbetter

A. G.

(1999). The specificity of memory enhancement during interaction with a virtual environment. Memory, 7(1): 65–78.

Cohn

J. V.

Helmick

Meyers

Burns

(2000). Training-transfer guidelines for virtual environments (VE). Presented at 22nd Annual Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando FL.

Gopher

Weil

Bareket

(1994) Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight. Human Factors 36(3): 387–405.

Lathan

C. E.

Tracey

M. R.

Sebrechts

M. M.

Clawson

D. M.

Higgins

G. A.

(2002). Using virtual environments as training simulators: Measuring transfer. In Stanney

K. M.

Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (pp. 403–414). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Morris

C. S.

Tarr

R. W.

(2002) Templates for selecting PC-based synthetic environments for application to human performance enhancement and training; Virtual Reality, 2002. 109.

Roscoe

Stanley N

. Aviation Psychology. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1982.

Rose Attree

F. D.

Brooks

E. A.

Parslow

B. M.

Penn

D. M.

Ambihaipahan

(2000). Training in virtual environments: Transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics, 43(4): 494–511.

Stanney

K. M.

Zyda

(2002). Virtual Environments in the 21st Century. In Stanney

K. M.

Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (pp. 403–414). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Witmer

B. G.

Bailey

J. H.

Knerr

B. W.

(1996). Virtual spaces and real world places: Transfer of route knowledge. International Journal Human- Computer Studies, 45: 413–428.

10.

Witmer

B. G.

Sadowski

W. J.

Jr. (1998). Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors, 40(3): 478–488.