This paper summarizes underlying theories from psychology that can contribute to the further development of the science of Hedonomics. The methodology in this emerging area is immature. Although we do not know fully understand the mechanics of He-donomics, we can measure emotions and apply the results in designing artifacts which hopefully will be affective and pleasurable. A model for design of pleasurable artifacts and tasks is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AboulafiaA.BannonL. J. (2004). Understanding affect in design: An outline conceptual framework. Theoretical Issues on Ergonomics Science, 5 (1), 4–15.
2.
BergmanE. (2000). Information Appliances and Beyond. San Diego: Academic Press.
3.
CamererC.LoewensteinG.PrelecD. (2003). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Working paper.
4.
CarrollJ. M. (2004). Beyond fun. Interactions, 11(4), 38–40.
5.
CsikzentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Collins.
6.
EpsteinS. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49 (8), 709–724.
7.
GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (2002). Heuristics and Biases. The Psychology of Intuitive Decision Making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
HelanderM. G.KhalidH. M. (2005, Chapter 21. Affective and Pleasure Based Design. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. New York: Wiley.
9.
HelanderM. G.ThamM. P. (2003). Hedonomics - Affective Human Factors Design. Ergonomics, 46 (13/14), 1269–1272.
10.
IsenA. M. (1999). On the relationship between affect and creative problem solving. In RussS.Affect, Creative Experience, and Psychological Adjustment, 3–17. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
11.
JordanP. W.. (1998). Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics, 29 (1), 25–33.
12.
KahnemanD. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice.
13.
KurosuM.KishimuraK. (1995). Apparent usability versus inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usabilityConference companion on human factors in computing systemsNew York: ACM Press.
14.
KubovyM. (1999). On the pleasures of the mind In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN.Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, 134–154. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
Le DouxJ. E. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 209–235.
16.
LeontjevA. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality. London: Prentice-Hall.
17.
NormanD. A.2004. Emotional Design: Why Do We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
18.
NagamachiM. (2001). Research on Kansei Engineering: Selected Papers on Kansei Engineering. Hiroshima, Japan: Nakamoto Printing.
19.
SeligmanM. E. P.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.
20.
SlovicP.FinucaneM.PetersE.MacGregorD. G. (2002). The Affect Heuristic. In GilovicT.GriffinD.KahnemanD.Intuitive Judgment: Heuristics and Biases, 397–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tractinsky N..
21.
KatzA. S.IkarD. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13, 127–145.
22.
ZajoncR. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking. Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35 (2), 151–175.
