The Use of Massive Multi-Player Gaming Technology for Military Training: A Preliminary Evaluation

Abstract

Publicly available Massive Multi-Player Games (MMPG) allow multiple individuals to work together in simulated situations. To meet complex game objectives, users must exhibit high degrees of coordination. This is similar to the types of interactions required for effective coordination in military team environments, and this resemblance has not gone unnoticed. DARWARS is an initiative that aims to support a diverse array of distributed simulation-based military instruction, including those that allow large numbers of participants to interact in on-line virtual worlds. In effect, MMPGs are being considered as platforms for future training. In this paper, we describe a framework and evaluate a preliminary methodology for training teamwork skills (e.g., information exchange, teammate monitoring) in an MMPG environment. Data collected from a field exercise of 40 infantry soldiers suggests that MMPGs are capable of training teamwork skills in distributed environments. Based on the results of this exercise, we provide practice-oriented guidelines for using MMPGs as a training tool, and offer some suggestions for future research into effective performance measurement paradigms in this environment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Castronova

(2001). Virtual Worlds: A First-Hand Account of Market and Society on the Cyberian Frontier. CESifo Working Paper No. 618.

Dwyer

D.J.

Fowlkes

J.E.

Oser

R.L.

Salas

Lane

N.E.

(1997). Team performance measurement in distributed environments: The TARGETS methodology. In Brannick

M.T.

Salas

Prince

. Team Performance Assessment and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Entin

E.E.

Diedrich

F.J.

Rubineau

(2003). Adaptive Communication Patterns in Different Organizational Structures. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.

Freeman

Diedrich

F. J.

Haimson

Diller

D. E.

Roberts

(2003). Behavioral representations for training tactical communication skills. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, Scottsdale, AZ.

Gentner

(1989). Mechanisms of analogical learning In Vosniadou

Ortony,

(Ed.). Simularoty and analogical learning (pp. 199–241). London: Cambridge University Press.

MacMillan

Littleton

E.B.

Price

Miescher

S.C.

Entin

E.E.

Gentner

F.C.

Tiller

T.C.

Cunningham

(2000). A Streamlined Scenario-Based Methodology For Evaluating Distributed Team Performance. Aptima Technical Report, Aptima, Inc., Woburn, MA.

Salas

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

(2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.

Sims

D.E.

Salas

Burke

C.S.

(2004). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.

Smith-Jentsch

K.A.

Johnston

J.H.

Payne

S.C.

(1998). Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments In Cannon-Bowers

J.A.

Salas

(Eds.). Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271–295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

10.

Smith-Jentsch

K.A.

Zeisig

R.L.

Acton

McPherson

J.A.

(1998). Team dimensional training: A strategy for guided team self-correction In Cannon-Bowers

J.A.

Salas

(Eds.). Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271–295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

11.

Weil

S.A.

Hussain

Diedrich

Ferguson

MacMillan

(2004). Assessing Distributed Team Performance in DARWARS Training: Challenges and Methods. Proceedings of the 2004 Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC).