Five modeling teams from industry and academia were chosen by the NASA Aviation Safety and Security Program to develop human performance models (HPM) of pilots performing taxi operations and runway instrument approaches with and without advanced displays. One representative from each team will serve as a panelist to discuss their team's model architecture, augmentations and advancements to HPMs, and aviation-safety related lessons learned. Panelists will discuss how modeling results are influenced by a model's architecture and structure, the role of the external environment, specific modeling advances and future directions and challenges for human performance modeling in aviation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BestB.LebiereC.SchunkD.JohnsonIArcherR. (2004). Validating a Cognitive Model of Approach Based on the ACT-R Architecture. (Technical Report). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis and Design, Inc.
2.
ByrneM. D.KirlikA. (2005). Using computational cognitive modeling to diagnose possible sources of aviation errorInternational Journal of Aviation Psychology, 15, 135–155.
3.
DeutschS.PewR. (2004). Examining new flight deck technology using human performance modeling. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting. (pp.108–112). Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
4.
GoodmanA.HooeyB. LFoyleD. C.WilsonJ. R. (2003). Characterizing Visual Performance During Approach and Landing With and Without a Synthetic Vision Display: A Part-Task Study. In FoyleD. C.GoodmanA.HooeyB. L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2003 NASA Aviation Safety Program Conference on Human Performance Modeling of Approach and Landing with Augmented Displays. Moffett Field, California: NASA Ames Research Center.
5.
HooeyB. L.FoyleD. C.AndreA. D. (2000). Integration of cockpit displays for surface operations: The final stage of a human-centered design approach. SAE TransactionsJournal of Aerospace, 109, 1053–1065.
6.
LeidenK.KellerJ. W.FrenchJ.W. (2001). Context of Human Error in Commercial Aviation. (Technical Report). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis and Design, Inc.
7.
LeidenK.LaugheryK. R.KellerJ. W.FrenchJ. W.WarwickW.WoodS.D. (2001). A Review of Human Performance Models for the Prediction of Human Error. (Technical Report). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis and Design, Inc.
8.
WickensC. D.GohJ.HellebergJHorreyW.TalleurD. A. (2003) Attentional models of multi-task pilot performance using advanced display technology. Human Factors, 45, 360–380.
9.
WickensC. D.McCarleyJ. S.AlexanderA. L.ThomasL. C.AmbinderM.ZhengS. (2005). Attention-Situation Awareness (A-SA) Model of Pilot Error. (Technical Report AHFD-04-15, NASA-04-5). Savoy, Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Institute of Aviation Human Factors Division.
