This project aims to provide selected follow-up healthcare services via Internet technologies. A usercentered approach and qualitative method of inquiry taken in the development of a prostate cancer Internet Clinical Communication Centre (iC3) to provide clinicians and patients access to portions of the electronic health record, illustrates the critical importance of security, privacy, and the patient-provider relationship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonR. J. (1994). Representations and requirements: The value of ethnography in systems designHuman-Computer Interaction, 9, 151–182.
2.
BaroudiJ.OlsonM.IvesB. (1986). An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfactionCommunication of the ACM, 29(3), 232–238.
3.
BrennanP.KuangY.VolrathongchaiK. (2000). Patient- centered information systems. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient centered Systems, 79–86.
4.
ChamberlainJ.MeliaJ.MossS.BrownJ. (1997). Report prepared for the health technology assessment panel of the nhs executive on the diagnosis, management, treatment and costs of prostate cancer in england and walesBr J Urol, 79, 1–32.
5.
CiminoJ.PatelV.KushnirukA. (2002). The patient clinical information system (PatCIS): Technical solutions for and experience with giving patients access to their electronic medical recordsInternational Journal of medical Informatics, 68, 113–127.
6.
HerleaD. (1999). User participation in requirements negotiationACM, 20(1).
7.
KaplanS. (1989). Assessing the effects of physicianpatient interactions on the outcomes of chronic diseaseMedical Care, 27, S110–S127.
8.
KerrJ.Schlesinger-RabbA.SauerH.HolzelD. (2003). Doctor-patient communication: Results of a four year propsective study in rectal cancer patientsDis Colon Rectum, 46(8), 1038–46.
9.
KujalaS. (2003). User involvement: A review of the benefits and challengesBehaviour and Information Technology, 22(1), 1–16.
10.
MettlinC.MurphyG.HoR.MenckH. (1996). The national cancer data base report on longitudinal observations on prostate cancerCancer, 77, 2162–6.
11.
MorrisonH.G. (1999). Online catalogue research and the verbal protocol methodLibrary Hi Tech, 17(2), 19–20.
12.
NaurP.RandallB. (Eds.). (1969). Software engineering: a report on a conference sponsored by the NATO science committee.Brussels: NATO, Scientific Affairs Division.
13.
ParkerS.TongT.BoldenS.WingoP. (1996). Cancer statistics 1996Cancer J Clin, 46, 5–27.
14.
PotoskyA.MillerB.AlbertsenP.KramerB. (1995). The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancerJournal of the American Medical Association, 273, 548–52.
15.
RizoC.LupeaD.BaybourdH.AndersonM.ClossonT.JadadA. (2005). What Internet services would patients like to get from hospitals during an epidemic? lessons from the SARS outbreak at the University Health Network in Toronto. Journal of Medical Internet Research.
16.
The Standish Group (1994). The high cost of chaos, few IS projects come in on time, on budget. Computerworld, 20.
17.
van't RietA.BergM.HiddemaF.SolK. (2001). Meeting patients' needs with patient information systems: Potential benefits of qualitative research methodsInt J Med Inform, 64(1), 1–14.
18.
WixonD.RameyJ. (Eds.). (1996). Field methods casebook for software design.John Wiley & Sons.
