Sitting or Standing for Computer Work — Does a Negative-Tilt Keyboard Tray Make a Difference?

Abstract

The effects of using an electric height-adjustable worksurface, with and without the addition of a negative-tilt keyboard tray, on wrist posture, comfort, typing performance and body movements was studied. Eighteen subjects experienced four test conditions: typing while sitting with the keyboard on a flat surface or negative tilt keyboard tray, and standing with the keyboard on a flat surface or negative tilt keyboard tray. Results show that the most neutral typing wrist posture (least wrist extension) was maintained when sitting rather than standing. There was a slight wrist posture benefit with the negative tilt tray for both sitting and standing. Sitting with a negative-tilt tray was the most comfortable condition. Sitting was more comfortable than standing. No performance differences between conditions were found. When sitting there was more foot movement than when standing. When standing there was more weight shifting than when sitting.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beynon

Reilly

. (2001) Spinal Shrinkage during a Seated Break and Standing Break during Simulated Nursing Tasks, Applied Ergonomics, 32(6), 617–622.

Dainoff

. (2002) The Effect of Ergonomic Worktools on Productivity In Today's Automated Workstation Design, 37 pages, http://www.ergosystems.com/ErgoInfo/Dainoff_Research_Report.pdf.

Hedge

Powers

J.R

. (1995) Wrist posture while keyboarding: Effects of a negative slope keyboard support system and full motion forearm supports, Ergonomics, 38, 508–517.

Hedge

Morimoto

McCrobie

. (1999) Effects of keyboard tray geometry on upper body posture and comfort, Ergonomics, 42 (10), 1333–1349.

Hedge

Ray

E.J

. (2004) Effects of an electronic height-adjustable worksurface on self-assessed musculoskeletal discomfort and productivity among computer workers, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Sept. 20-24, HFES, Santa Monica, 1091–1095.

Nerhood

H.L.

Thompson

S.W

. (1994) Adjustable Sit-Stand Workstations in the Office, People and Technology in Harmony. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee, October 24-28, The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, California, 1, 668–672.

Paul

R.D

. (1995a) Foot Swelling in VDT Operators with Sitting and Sit-Stand Workstations, Designing for the Global Village. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, October 9-13, The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, California, 1, 568–572.

Paul

R.D

. (1995b) Effects of Office Layout and Sit-Stand Adjustable Furniture: A Field Study, Designing for the Global Village. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, October 9-13, The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, California, 1, 422–426.

Paul

R.D.

Helander

M.G

. (1995a) Effect of Sit-Stand Schedule on Spinal Shrinkage in VDT Operators, Designing for the Global Village. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, October 9-13, The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, California, 1, 563–567.

10.

Paul

R.D.

Helander

M.G

. (1995b) Spinal Shrinkage in Sedentary and Non-Sedentary VDT Jobs, Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety VII, Edited by Bittner

A.C.

Champney

P.C.

. Taylor & Francis, London, Pp: 631–637.

11.

Roelofs

Straker

. (2002) The Experience of Musculoskeletal Discomfort amongst Bank Tellers Who Just Sit, Just Stand or Sit and Stand at Work, Ergonomics SA, 14(2), 11–29.

12.

Rudakewych

Valent-Weitz

Hedge

(2001) Effects of an ergonomic intervention on musculoskeletal discomfort among office workers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 1, 791–795.