Customers assess a company's ability to meet their needs based upon service interactions with that company. The growth of the Internet as an information transfer medium has dramatically increased reliance on communication between a human and a computer during service interactions. Although trust is known to be an integral part of customer experience during human-to-human interactions, it has been suggested that even when service is provided by an inanimate entity, trust remains a relevant factor. This study evaluated a tool purporting to measure system trust during automated service interactions. Participants completed an auto rate quote via one of two insurers' websites. A two-factor structure was uncovered. The scale exhibited strong internal consistency, sensitivity to objective task success, and was significantly related to several other customer experience measures. The results provide convergent evidence that the scale is a valid and reliable tool for describing customers' experiences during automated interactions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BisantzA.SeongY. (2001). Assessment of operator trust in and utilization of automated decision-aids under different framing conditions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28, 85–97.
2.
De VriesP.MiddenC.BouwhuisD. (2003). The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 719–735.
3.
DontjeM. J.OlthofC. F. (1999). No trade without trust. Compact, 6, 11–21.
GarbarinoE.JohnsonM. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63, 70–87.
6.
GassenheimerJ. B.ManolisC. (2001). The influence of product customization and supplier selection on future intentions: The mediating effects of salesperson and organizational trust. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 4, 418–435.
7.
Grabner-KräuterS.KaluschaE.A. (2003). Empirical research in on-line trust: A review and critical assessment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 783–812.
8.
HartS.G.StavelandL.E. (1987). Development of NASATLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.) Human mental workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9.
HawesJ. (1994). To know me is to trust me. Industrial Marketing Management, 23, 215–219.
10.
HawesJ.MastK. E.SwanJ. E. (1989). Trust earning perceptions of sellers and buyers. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 9, 1, 1–8.
11.
HessJ. S. (1995). Construction and assessment of a scale to measure consumer trust. American Marketing Association, Summer, 20–27.
12.
JianJ-Y.BisantzA. M.DruryC. G. (1998). Towards an empirically determined scale of trust in computerized systems: Distinguishing concepts and types of trust. In Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 501–505.
13.
JianJ-Y.BisantzA. M.DruryC. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of cognitive Ergonomics, 4, 1, 53–71.
14.
LeeJ. D.MorayN. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153–184.
15.
LeeJ.D.SeeK.A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50–80.
16.
LewisJ.R. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 463–488.
17.
MacDonaldA. P.KesselV. S.FullerJ. B. (1972). Selfdisclosure and two kinds of trust. Psychological Reports, 30, 143–148.
18.
MasolonisA.J.ParasuramanR. (1999). Trust as a construct for evaluating automated aids: Past and future theory and research. In Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 1601–1606.
19.
MorganR. M.HuntS. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.
20.
PlankR. E.ReidD. A.PullinsE. B. (1999). Perceived trust in business-to-business sales: A new measure. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 24, 3, 61–71.
21.
RotterJ. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1, 1–7.
22.
SheridanT. B. (1988). Trustworthiness of command and control systems. IFAC Man-Machine Systems, 427–431.
23.
SoM.W.C.SculliD. (2002). The role of trust, quality, value and risk in conducting e-business. Industrial Management + Data systems, 102, 8/9, 503–512.
24.
TullisT.S.StetsonJ.N. (2004). A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association Conference, Minneapolis, MN: UPA.
25.
TurnerC.W.SafarJ.A.HardzinskiM.BerubeD. (2005). The effects of service availability and recognition errors on trust in voice user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society 49thAnnual Meeting. Orlando, FL: HFES.
26.
WalczuchR.SeelenJ.LundgrenH. (2001). Psychological determinants for consumer trust in eretailing. In Proceedings of the Eight Research Symposium on Emergin Electronic Markets, 1–21.
