We examine the effect of environmental cues on being interrupted while performing a task. We conducted an experiment in which participants, after an interruption, received either a blatant environmental cue of their previous action (a red arrow), a subtle environmental cue of their previous action (a cursor that was placed in the same location as their previous action), or no environmental cue at all. We found that participants in the blatant condition resumed their task faster than participants in the other two conditions. Furthermore, a subtle environmental cue was no better than no cue at all. The results support our model of memory for goals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamczykP. D.BaileyB. P. (2004). If not now, when? The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In Human factors in computing systems: Proceedings of chi1904 (pp. 271–278). New York: ACM Press.
2.
AltmannE. M.TraftonJ. G. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26(1), 39–83.
3.
AltmannE. M.TraftonJ. G. (2004). Task interruption: Disruptive effects and the role of cues. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Chicago, IL: Erlbaum.
4.
AndersonJ. R.BothellD.ByrneM. D.DouglasS.LebiereC.QinY. (2004). An integrated theory of mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060.
5.
AndersonJ. R.LebiereC. (1998). Atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BallasJ. A.KierasD. E.MeyerD. E.BrockD.StroupJ. (1999). Cueing of display objects by 3-d audio to reduce automation deficit. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Symposium on Situational Awareness in the Tactical Environment, Patuxent River, MD.
7.
BrockD.BallasJ. A.StroupJ. L. (2002a). Using an auditory display to manage attention in a dual task, multiscreen environment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display 2002, Kyoto, Japan.
8.
BrockD.StroupJ. L.BallasJ. A. (2002b). Effects of 3d auditory display on dual task performance in a simulated multiscreen watchstation environment. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Baltimore, MD.
9.
BrockD.TraftonJ. G. (1999). Cognitive representation of common ground in user interfaces. In KayJ. (Ed.), User modeling: Proceedings of the seventh international conference. New York, NY: Springer-Wien.
10.
ChaseW. G.EricssonK. A. (1981). Skilled memory. In AndersonJ. R. (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 141–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
ChaseW. G.EricssonK. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 16. New york (pp. Academic Press).
12.
CutrellE.CzerwinskiM.HorvitzE. (2001). Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In Interact 2001: Ifip conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 263–269). Tokyo, Japan.
13.
CzerwinskiM.CutrellE.HorvitzE. (2000). Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. In Proceedings of ozchi 2000 (pp. 356–361). Sydney, Australia: Academic Press.
14.
EricssonK. A. (2003). Exceptional memorizers: Made, not born. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(6), 233–235.
15.
EricssonK. A.KintschW. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245.
16.
McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O.GrahamT.RallE. (2004). Delaying execution of intentions: Overcoming the costs of interruptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(5), 533–547.
17.
MonkC.Boehm-DavisD.TraftonJ. G. (2004). Recovering from interruptions: Implications for driver distraction research. Human Factors, 46(4), 650–663.
18.
OulasvirtaA.SaariluomaP. (2004). Long-term working memory and interrupting messages in human-computer interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(1), 53–64.
19.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
20.
TraftonJ. G.AltmannE. M.BrockD. P.MintzF. E. (2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58(5), 583–603.
21.
ZacksJ.TverskyB. (2001). Event structure in perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3–21.
22.
ZacksJ.TverskyB.IyerG. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 29–58.
