Using Terrain-depicting Primary Flight Displays for performing instrument-referenced tasks: Can we empirically test for ‘Equivalent level of safety’ ?

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine if primary flight displays (PFDs) depicting terrain could be used with a level of safety equivalent to electronic attitude-direction indicators (EADIs) without terrain. Five groups of 8 pilots each flew scenarios in a flight simulator using one of three PFDs with or without guidance cues. Performances of instrument-referenced maneuvers using the EADI were measured, followed by trials with an experimental format. Performance measures included initial response time, total recovery time, and control reversals. Traditional parametric analyses found no significant performance differences between groups. Analyses using confidence intervals to assess equivalence of distributions showed group performances were essentially the same. Pilot preferences were examined and are reported. It was concluded that the specific terrain representations did not reduce the level of safety for these specific maneuvers. This technique is recommended for applicants wishing to demonstrate a level of safety equivalent to existing systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alter

K. W.

Barrows

A. K.

Jennings

C. W.

Powell

J. D.

(2000). 3-D perspective primary flight displays for aircraft. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 3-29–3-32.

Arthur

J.J.

III Prinzel

L.J.

III Kramer

L.J.

Parrish

R.V.

Bailey

R.E.

(2004). Flight simulator evaluation of synthetic vision display concepts to prevent controlled flight into terrain (CFIT). Springfield, VA: NTIS, NASA/TP-2004-213008.

Beringer

D. B.

(2000). Development of highway-in-the-sky displays for flight-path guidance: History, performance results, guidelines. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 3-21–3-24.

Gershzohn

, (2001). Unusual attitude recovery using the roll arrow. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., SAE Technical Paper, Document Number 2001-01-3009.

Reising

J.M.

Liggett

K.K.

Kustra

T.W.

Snow

M. P.

(1998). Evaluation of pathway symbology used to land from curved approaches with varying visibility conditions. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1–5.

Rogers

J. L.

Howard

K. I.

Vessey

J. T.

(1993). Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 553–565.

Seaman

M. A.

Serlin

R.C.

(1998). Equivalence confidence intervals for two-group comparisons of means. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 403–411.

Taylor

H. L.

Talleur

D. A.

Rantanen

E. M.

Emanuel

T. W.

(2004). The effectiveness of a personal computer aviation training device, a flight training device, and an airplane in conducting instrument proficiency checks. Savoy, IL: University of Illinois Institute of Aviation, Technical Report AHFD-04-12/FAA-04-5.