Flightpath Tracking,Change Detection and Visual Scanning in an Integrated Hazard Display

Abstract

Twenty-four certified flight instructors were required to fly a series of curved, step-down approaches while detecting changes to surrounding traffic aircraft and weather cell icons on two integrated hazard display (IHD) formats (2D coplanar and split-screen) under varying workload levels. Generally, it appears that the 2D coplanar IHD was better in supporting flightpath tracking and change detection performance when compared to a split-screen display. Pilots exhibited superior flightpath tracking (in the vertical dimension, and under low workload) when using the 2D coplanar IHD, although this effect was mitigated by increasing workload such that tracking deteriorated faster with the 2D coplanar than the split-screen display. The spawned 3D cost of diminished size with distance from ownship played a role in change detection response time—pilots were slower (particularly in detecting traffic aircraft changes) with the split-screen compared to the 2D coplanar IHD. These effects will be discussed within the context of visual scanning measures.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

A.L.

Wickens

C.D.

(2004). Measuring traffic awareness in an integrated hazard display. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 171–175). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

Alexander

A.L.

Wickens

C.D.

(2005). Synthetic vision systems: Flightpath tracking, situation awareness, and visual scanning in an integrated hazard display. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Oklahoma City, OK: FAA.

Alexander

A.L.

Wickens

C.D.

Hardy

T.J.

(in press). Synthetic vision and the primary flight display: The effects of guidance symbology, display size, and field of view. Human Factors.

Alexander

A.L.

Wickens

C.D.

Merwin

D. H.

(2005). Perspective and coplanar cockpit displays of traffic information: Implications for maneuver choice, flight safety, and mental workload. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 15(1), 1–21.

Endsley

M.R.

(1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Endsley

M.R.

(1995). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 65–84.

McGreevy

M.W.

Ellis

S. R.

(1986). The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments. Human Factors, 28 (4), 439–456.

Muthard

E.K.

Wickens

C.D.

(2002). Factors that mediate flight plan monitoring and errors in plan revision: An examination of planning under automated conditions (Technical Report AFHD-02-11/NASA-02-8). Savoy, IL: Aviation Human Factors Division.

Olmos

Wickens

C.D.

Chudy

(2000). Tactical displays for combat awareness: An examination of dimensionality and frame of reference concepts and the application of cognitive engineering. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10(3), 247–271.

10.

Prinzel

L.J.

Comstock

J.R.

Glaab

L.J.

Kramer

L.J.

Arthur

J.J.

(2004). The efficacy of head-down and head-up synthetic vision display concepts for retro- and forward-fit of commercial aircraft. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14 (1), 53–77.

11.

Schnell

Kwon

Merchant

Etherington

(2004). Improved flight technical performance in flight decks equipped with synthetic vision information system displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14 (1).

12.

St. John

Cowen

M.B.

Smallman

H.S.

Oonk

H.M.

(2001). The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape-understanding versus relative-position tasks. Human Factors, 43 (1), 79–98.

13.

Wickens

C.D.

(2000). The when and how of using 2-D and 3-D displays for operational tasks. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

14.

Williams

Waller

Koelling

Burdette

Doyle

Capron

Barry

Gifford

(2001). Concept of operations for commercial and business aircraft synthetic vision systems (Version 1.0, Draft Technical Memorandum). Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.