With emerging technology and globalization, distributed teamwork has become vital to organizational success and virtual environments are increasingly being utilized to “close the gap” between dispersed team members. Although most research conducted during the past few decades has focused on co-located teams, some efforts have analyzed the inputs, processes, and outputs necessary for effective interaction in virtual teams. For example, the Virtual Team Research Model proposed by Driskell and colleagues (2003) addresses the effects of computer mediated communication on team performance. Our current initiative expands upon this model by focusing on distributed teams that utilize virtual technology. We feel that by simultaneously considering both socio (i.e., distributed teamwork) and technical (i.e., virtual environments) factors, a more detailed picture of virtual teams will be illuminated and thereby more robust guidance can be provided to future research endeavors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoineyL. G. (2001). Gender Impacts Virtual Work Teams: Men want clear objectives while women value communication. Retrieved on March 13, 2003, from http://gbr.pepperdine.edu/014/teams.html.
2.
BowersC. A.JentschF.SalasE.BraunC. C. (1998). Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Human Factors, 40(4), 672–679.
3.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.TannenbaumS. I.SalasE.VolpeC. E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In GuzzoR. A.SalasE. (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
DraperM. H.ViirreE. S.FurnessT. A.GawronV. J. (2001). Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43(1), 129–146.
6.
DriskellJ. E.RadtkeP.H.SalasE. (2003). Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team processes. Group Dynamics, 7(4), 297–323.
7.
FioreS. M.SalasE.BowersC. A. (2003). Distributed coordination space: Toward a theory of distributed team performance. In KarwowskiW. (Ed.), Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science.London: Taylor & Francis.
8.
GibsonC. B.CohenS. G., (Eds.) (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
LombardM.DittonT. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved on September 1, 2002 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
11.
PersianiF. (2001). Semi-Immersive Virtual Reality. Presented at the XII ADM International Conference in Rimini, Italy, September 5-7, 2001.
12.
Psotka (1995). Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training.
13.
RegenbrechtH.SchubertT. (2002). Real and illusory interactions enhance presence in virtual environments. Presence, 11(4), 425–434.
14.
RegenbrechtH.SchubertT.FriedmannF. (1998). Measuring the sense of presence and its relations to fear of heights in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10(3), 233–250.
15.
SalasE.BurkeC. S.StaglK. C. (2004). Developing teams and team leaders: Strategies and principles. In DayD.ZaccaroS. J.HalpinS. M. (Eds.), Leader development for transforming organizations.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16.
SauerJ.WastellD. G.HockeyG. R. J.CrawshawC. M.IshakM.DowningJ. C. (2002). Effects of display design on performance in a simulated ship navigation environment. Ergonomics, 45(5), 329–347.
17.
Smith-JentschR. L.ZeisigB. A.JamesA.McPhersonJ. A. (2000). Team Dimensional Training: A Strategy for Guided Team Self-Correction. In Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (Eds.), Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training (pp.). Washington, DC: APA.
18.
SlaterM. (1999). Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8, 560–565.
19.
SlaterM.WilburS. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 603–616.
20.
TownsendA.M.DeMarieS.M.HendricksonA.R. (1996). A multi-disciplinary approach to the study of virtual workgroups. Proceedings of the 1996 Decision Sciences Institute..
21.
VenkateshV.JohnsonP. (2002). Telecommuting technology implementations: A within-and between-subjects longitudinal field study. Personnel Psychology, 55(3), 661–688.
22.
WallerD. (2000). Individual differences in spatial learning from computer-simulated environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(4), 307–321.
23.
WitmerB. G.SingerM. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240.
