Debriefing is the principal forum in which teams receive feedback concerning their performance in scenario-based training. We consider the audiences and functions served by current debriefing practices. We define additional audiences and functions that will be supported by an advanced debriefing system now being designed for Navy training exercises.
CohenM.S.FreemanJ.T.ThompsonB.T. (1998). Critical Thinking Skills in Tactical Decision Making: A Model and A Training Method. (Canon-BowersJ.SalasE., eds.), Decision-Making Under Stress: Implications for Training & Simulation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Publications.
3.
DismukesR. K.McDonnellL. K.JobeK. K. (2000) Facilitating LOFT debriefings: Instructor techniques and crew participation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10: 35.
4.
DixonNancy M. (2000). Common knowledge: how companies thrive by sharing what they know.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5.
EricssonK. AndersCharnessN. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–47.
6.
FreemanJ.LittletonB.HaimsonC.StrettonM.FowlkesJ.CarolanT.BilazarianP.RadtkeP. (2003). Concept of operations & experimental plan (v2.0) for debriefing distributed scenario-based exercises (DDSBE). Aptima Technical Report AP-1219. ONR Contract #N61339-99-D-0012.
7.
JohnstonJ.H.SerfatyD.FreemanJ. (2003). Performance measurement for diagnosing and debriefing distributed command and control teams. Proceedings of the 8th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Washington, DC.
8.
MacMillanJ.PaleyM.J.LevchukY.N.EntinE.E.SerfatyD.FreemanJ.T. (2002). Designing the best team for the task: Optimal organizational structures for military missions. In McNeeseM.SalasE.EndsleyM. (Eds.), New trends in cooperative activities: system dynamics in complex settings. San Diego, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Press.
9.
SchankR.C.AbelsonR.Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1977.
