Judgments of Speed of Self-Motion: Modeling the Relative Effects of Speed and Altitude Change

Abstract

Empirical studies consistently show that judgments of the speed of self-motion are influenced by changes in the altitude of an observer. In general, a given actual speed is judged to be relatively faster from a lower altitude and relatively slower from a higher altitude. Similarly, loss of altitude can be accompanied by a false perception of increasing speed, while increases in altitude can be accompanied by a false perception of loss in speed. The direction of these effects is consistent with the Global Optical Flow Rate (GOFR) Hypothesis. However, the pattern of effects is not proportional to the ratio of velocity to altitude as predicted by the GOFR Hypothesis. An alternative model is presented that predicts additive effect of speed and altitude changes on speed perception.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ballard

T. G.

Roach

Dyre

B. P.

(1998). Use of global optical flow rates depends on their validity as determinants of egospeed. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1440–1444.

Dyre

B. P.

(1997). Perception of accelerating self-motion: Global optical flow rate dominates discontinuity rate. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1333–1337.

Gibson

J. J.

(1958). Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 433–471.

Gibson

J. J.

Olum

Rosenblatt

(1955). Parallax and the perspective during aircraft landings. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 372–385.

Larish

J. F.

Flach

J. M.

(1990). Sources of optical information useful for the perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 295–302.

Langewiesche

(1944). Stick and Rudder. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Owen

D. H.

Warren

(1987). Perception and control of self-motion: Implications for visual simulation of vehicular locomotion. In Mark

L.S.

Warm

J.S.

Huston

R. L.

(Eds.) Ergonomics and human factors: Recent research. (pp. 40–70). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Patrick

D. L.

Flach

J. M.

Jacques

P. F.

(2003). Ambiguities in global optical flow: Tuning in to speed and altitude changes. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. CD.

Warren

(1982). Optical transformations during movement: review of the optical concomitants of egomotion. (NTIS Tech Rep. No. AD-A122275). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology.