Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research on auditory graphs has investigated mappings, scalings, and polarities (Walker, 2002), as well as the addition of some contextual design features (Bonebright, Nees, Connerley, & McCain, 2001; Flowers, Buhman, & Turnage, 1997), in order to improve performance. However, little has been done to quantify the performance effects of such features, or to investigate effects of training in specific sonification tasks such as point estimation. Smith and Walker (2002) took a step towards quantifying and comparing the effects of adding several contextual design features. Presented here are selected results from a comprehensive follow-on study comparing effects of adding auditory context, either with or without training. The overall results indicate that some kinds of auditory context improved performance, while others did not. Training improved performance, and an interaction was discovered between type of auditory context and type of training (Smith, 2003). Implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. A.

(1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 41–74.

Bonebright

T. L.

Nees

M. A.

Connerley

T. T.

McCain

G. R.

(2001, July 29 - August 1). Testing the effectiveness of sonified graphs for education: A programmatic research project. Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 62–66), Espoo, Finland.

Cohen

(1994). Monitoring background activities. In Kramer

(Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 449–531). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Flowers

J. H.

Buhman

D. C.

Turnage

K. D.

(1997). Cross-modal equivalence of visual and auditory scatterplots for exploring bivariate data samples. Human Factors, 39(3)(September), 341–351.

Johannsen

(2002, July). Auditory display of directions and states for mobile systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 98–103), Kyoto, Japan.

Kramer

Walker

Bonebright

Cook

Flowers

Miner

(1999). The sonification report: Status of the field & research agenda: The International Community for Auditory Display.

Marila

(2002, July). Experimental comparison of complex and simple sounds in menu and hierarchy sonification. Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 104–108), Kyoto, Japan.

Proctor

R. W.

Dutta

(1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Quinones

M. A.

Ehrenstein

(1996). Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

10.

Salvendy

(1997). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

11.

Smith

D. R.

(2003). Effects of training and context on human performance in a point estimation sonification task. Unpublished Master's thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.

12.

Smith

D. R.

Walker

B. N.

(2002, July). Tick-marks, axes, and labels: The effects of adding context to auditory graphs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 362–368), Kyoto, Japan.

13.

Walker

B. N.

(2002). Magnitude estimation of conceptual data dimensions for use in sonification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 211–221.

14.

Wickens

C. D.

Liu

(1988). Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors, 30(5), 599–616.

Effects of Training and Auditory Context on Performance of a Point Estimation Sonification Task

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References