A Work Domain Analysis involves the context independent representation of work domain resources as a field for action. However, formal knowledge may not represent all of the resources available to workers in practice. Thus expert knowledge is essential to an accurate inventory of work domain resources. Most knowledge elicitation methods involve self-reports, which are subject to bias. This paper presents video-cued recall as a technique that may reduce bias. This technique proved useful as part of a Work Domain Analysis of the intensive care unit patient work domain.
BisantzA. M.BurnsC. M.RothE. (2002) Validating methods in Cognitive Engineering: A comparison of two work Domain models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting. Baltimore, Maryland. P. 521–525. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
3.
BurnsC. M.BryantD.ChalmersB. (2002) Assessment of the TADMUS DSS with work Domain analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting. Baltimore, Maryland. P. 453–455. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
4.
CrandallB.Getchell-ReiterK. (1993) Critical Decision Method: A technique for eliciting concrete assessment indicators from the intuition of NICU nurses. Advances in Nursing Science. 16 (1) 42–51.
5.
FlachJ. (2000). Discovering situated meaning: An ecological approach to task analysis. In SchraagenJ. M.ChipmanS. F.ShalinV. L. (2000) Cognitive Task Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
6.
HajdukiewiczJ. R. (1998) Development of a Structured approach for Patient monitoring in the Operating room. Masters thesis. Toronto: Department of Mechanical and industrial engineering, University of Toronto.
7.
HillC. E.O'BrienK. M. (1999). Helping Skills: Facilitating exploration, insight and action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
HoffmanR. RShadboltN. R.BurtonA. M.KleinG. (1995) Eliciting Knowledege from Experts: A methodological analysis. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 65, (2). 129–158.
9.
KleinG. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
10.
McLennanJ.OmodeiM. M.RichD.WearingA. J. (1997). Helmet mounted video in fire officer training and operations. Journal of the Fire Service College, 3(3), 67–74.
11.
McLennanJ.OmodeiM. M.WearingA. J. (2000). Cognitive Processes of first –on- Scene Fire Officers in command at emergency incidents as an analogue of small-unit command in peace support operations. 2nd International workshop on the Human in Command: Peace Support Operations. Breda, Netherlands: HiC2000.
12.
MillerA. (2003). Developing an integrated information representation for the medical ICU: Generalising Work Domain Analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis. School of Psychology. University of Queensland.
13.
MillerA. (2004). A Work Domain Analysis framework for modelling patients as the system at the core of medical Intensive Care Units. Cognition Technology and Work (online publication). 6 (2).
14.
MillerA.SandersonP. (2003a) An alternative ADS for the analysis, design and evaluation of information representations in the ICU. Proceedings of EAM2003. The 22nd European Conference on human Decision making and Manual control.Linkoping, Sweden: University of Linkoping.
15.
MillerASandersonP (2003b) Designing an information display for clinical decision making in the Intensive Care Unit. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting – Denver.Santa Monica, Ca: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16.
NaikarN.SandersonP. (2001). Work domain analysis for training system definition and acquisition. International journal of aviation psychology, 9(3), 271–290.
17.
OmodeiM. M.McLennanJ. P.WearingA. J. (in press). How expertise is applied in real-world dynamic environments: Head mounted video and cued recall as a methodology for studying routines of decision making. In HaberstrohS. (Ed.). The Routines of Decision Making. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
18.
RasmussenJ. (1979). On the structure of knowledge- a morphology of mental models in a man-machine systems context. Denmark: Riso National Laboratory.
19.
RasmussenJ. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. New York: North Holland.
20.
RasmussenJ.PejtersenA. M.GoodsteinL. P. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
21.
SharpT. D. (1996). Progress towards a development methodology for decision supporet systems for use in Time-critical highly uncertain and complex environments. Unpublished PhD thesis. Department of electrical and computer engineering, University of Cincinnati.
22.
SmithA. E. (2000a) Machine Learning of well defined thesaurus concepts. Proceedings of the International Workshop on text and web mining (pricai 2000). Melbourne, Australia. 72–79.
23.
SmithA. E. (2000b). Machine mappings of document collections: the Leximancer system. Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Document Computing Symposium, Sunshine Coast, Australia: DSTC. (http://www.leximancer.com/technology.html).
24.
VicenteK. J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards safe, productive and healthy computer based work. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
