The role of supervisors to aid injured workers by accessing health care and providing reasonable accommodations has been suggested as a means to prevent prolonged disability among workers experiencing musculoskeletal pain and discomfort. Based on a macroergonomic approach, a 4-hour supervisor training workshop was designed to optimize supervisors' responses to work injuries through improved communication and accommodation. Supervisors from two industries provided high ratings of the workshop, and showed post-training improvements in injury-related attitudes and perceived ability to communicate with and accommodate injured workers effectively. Workers' compensation claims data in the 7 months before and after the workshop showed a 47% reduction in new claims and an 18% reduction in active lost-time claims versus 27% and 7% respectively, in the control group. Improving the response of frontline supervisors to employees' work-related health and safety concerns may produce sustainable reduction in injury claims and disability costs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkabasS. H.GatesL. B.GalvinD. E., 1992. Disability management: A complete system to reduce costs, increase productivity, meet employee needs, and ensure legal compliance. New York: American Management Association.
2.
AkabusS. H.GatesL. B., 1991. Disability management: Labor management initiatives in early intervention, final report. New York: Center for Social Policy and Practice in the Workplace, Columbia University School of Social Work.
3.
CheadleA.FranklinG.WolfhagenC.SavarinoJ.LiuP. Y.SalleyC.WeaverM., 1994. Factors influencing the duration of work-related disability: A population-based study of Washington State workers' compensation. American Journal of Public Health84 (2), 190–196.
4.
ElferingA.SemmerN. K.SchadeV.GrundS.BoosN., 2002. Supportive colleague, unsupportive supervisor: The role of provider-specific constellations of social support at work in the development of low back pain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology7 (2), 130–140.
5.
FitzlerS. L.BergerR. A., 1982. Attitudinal change: The Chelsea Back Program. Occupational Health & Safety51 (2), 24–26.
6.
FitzlerS. L.BergerR. A., 1983. Chelsea Back Program: One year later. Occupational Health & Safety52 (7), 52–54.
7.
FosterN. E.PincusT.UnderwoodM. R.VogelS.BreenA.HardingG., 2003. Understanding the process of care for musculoskeletal conditions–why a biomedical approach is inadequate. Rheumatology42 (3), 401–404.
8.
GatesL. B., 1993. The role of the supervisor in successful adjustment to work with a disabling condition: Issues for disability policy and practice. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation3 (4), 179–190.
9.
GatesL. B.AkabasS. H.Oran-SabiaV., 1998. Relationship accommodations involving the work group: Improving work prognosis for persons with mental health conditions. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal21 (3), 264–272.
10.
GreenwoodJ. G.WolfH. J.PearsonR. J.Ling-WoonC.PoseyP.MainC. F., 1990. Early intervention in low back disability among coal miners in West Virginia: Negative findings. Journal of Occupational Medicine32 (10), 1047–1052.
11.
HabeckR. V.LeahyM. J.HuntH. A.ChanF.WelchE. M., 1991. Employer factors related to workers' compensation claims and disability management. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin34 (3), 210–226.
12.
HabeckR. V.ScullyS. M.VanTolB.HuntH. A., 1998. Successful employer strategies for preventing and managing disability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin42 (2), 144–160.
13.
HazardR.HaughL. D.ReidS.McFarlaneG.MacDonaldL., 1997. Early physician notification of patient disability risk and clinical guidelines after low back injury: A randomized, controlled trial. Spine22 (24), 2951–2958.
14.
KushnirT.LuriaO., 2002. Supervisors' attitudes toward return to work after myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine44 (4), 331–337.
15.
LeighJ. P.MarkowitzS. B.FahsM.ShinC.LandriganP. J., 1997. Occupational injury and illness in the United States: Estimates of costs, morbidity, and mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine157 (14), 1557–1568.
16.
MargoshesB. G.WebsterB. S., 2000. Why do occupational injuries have different health outcomes? In: MayerTGGatchelRJPolatinPB, ed. Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 47–61.
17.
MarholdC.LintonS. J.MelinL., 2002. Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: Evaluation of a questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation12 (2), 65–75.
18.
McLellanR. K.PranskyG.ShawW. S., 2001. Disability management training for supervisors: A pilot intervention program. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation11 (1), 33–41.
19.
MorkenT.MoenB.RiiseT.Vigeland-HaugeS. H.HolienS.LangedragA.OlsonH.PedersenS.Liahjell-SaueI. L.SeljeboG. M.ThoppilV., 2002. Effects of a training program to improve musculoskeletal health among industrial workers–effects of supervisors role in the intervention. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics30, 115–127.
20.
National Research Council, 2001. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: Low back and upper extremities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
PranskyG.ShawW. S.McLellanR. K., 2001. Employer attitudes, training, and return to work outcomes: A pilot study. Assistive Technology13 (2), 131–138.
22.
SalkeverD. S.ShinogleJ. A.PurushothamanM., 2001. Employer disability management strategies and other predictors of injury claims rates and costs: Analysis of employment-based long-term disability insurance claims. Journal of Safety Research32, 157–185.
23.
ShreyD. E., 1996. Disability management in industry: The new paradigm in injured worker rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation18 (8), 408–414.
24.
ShawW. S.RobertsonM. M.PranskyG.McLellanR. K., 2003. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.
25.
ShawW.RobertsonS.PranksyM. M.McLellanG., 2003. In prep.
26.
StruninL.BodenL. I., 2000. Paths of re-entry: Employment experiences of injured workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine38 (4), 373–384.
