In this paper, we examine quality of working life (QWL) and evaluate and compare the predictors of QWL among 624 women and men in a variety of information technology (IT) jobs in five companies. The following QWL factors were examined: job satisfaction, fatigue, tension, organizational involvement, and burnout. The following predictors of QWL were studied: IT demands, role ambiguity, decision control, challenge and demographics (age, marital status, parental status, and education). Analysis shows that in our sample women in IT jobs do not report poorer QWL than men in IT jobs. On the contrary, women report greater organizational involvement than men.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BabaV.JamalM. (1991). Routinization of job context and job content as related to employees' quality of working life: A study of Canadian nurses. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 379–386.
2.
BaroudiJ. J.IgbariaM. (1995). An examination of gender effects on career success of information systems employees. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(3), 181–201.
3.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2003). Current Population Surveys, 2002 Annual Averages.
4.
CaplanR. D.CobbS.FrenchJ. R. P.HarrisonR. V.PinneauS. R. (1975). Job Demands and Worker Health. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
5.
CarayonP. (1997). Temporal issues of quality of working life and stress in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9(4), 325–342.
6.
CarayonP.BrunetteM. J.SchwarzJ.HoonakkerP.HaimsM. C. (2003). Paths to retention and turnover in the IT workforce: Understanding the relationships between gender, minority status, job and organizational factors. An NSF information technology workforce study: Interim report: Phase 1 pilot study. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin- Madison.
7.
CarayonP.BrunetteM. J.SchwarzJ.HoonakkerP.HaimsM. C. (2003). Paths to retention and turnover in the IT workforce: Understanding the relationships between gender, minority status, job and organizational factors: Interim Report: Phase 1 pilot study. Madison, WI: NSF Information Technology Workforce Study and Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin- Madison.
8.
CarayonP.SchoepkeJ.HoonakkerP.HaimsM.BrunetteM. (2004). Evaluating the causes and consequences of turnover intention among IT users: The development of a questionnaire survey. Submitted to Behaviour and Information Technology.
9.
CarayonP.SmithM. J. (2000). Work organization and ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 649–662.
10.
CAWMSET (2000). Land of Plenty: Diversity as America's Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology. Washington DC: Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development.
11.
CookJ.WallT. D. (1980). New work attitudes measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 53, 39–52.
12.
CooperC. L.MarshallJ. (1976). Occupational sources of stress: A review of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental ill health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 49(1), 11–25.
13.
CordesC.DoughertyT. (1993). A review and an integration of research on job burnout. Academy of Management: The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 621–656.
14.
DavisL. E. (1983). Design of new organizations. In KolodnyH.BeinumH. v. (Eds.), The Quality of Working Life and the 1980s (pp. 65–86). New York: Praeger Publishers.
15.
GroveR. J.PrapavessisH. (1992). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of an abbreviated profile of mood states. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23(2), 93–109.
16.
IgbariaM.GreenhausJ. (1992). Determinants of MIS Employees' Turnover Intentions: A Structural Equation Model. Communications of the ACM, 35(2).
17.
IgbariaM.GreenhausJ. H. (1992). Determinants of MIS employees' turnover intentions: A structural equation model. Communications of the ACM, 35(2), 34–51.
18.
ITAA (2000). Building the 21st Century Information Technology Workforce: Underrepresented Groups in the Information Technology Workforce (Task Force Report): Information Technology Association of America.
19.
ITAA (2002). Bouncing back: Jobs, skills and the continuing demand for IT workers: Information Technology Association of America.
20.
KalimoR.ToppinenS. (1995). Burnout in computer professionals. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Work, Stress and Health 1995: Creating Healthier Workplaces, Washington, DC.
21.
KarasekR. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.
22.
LeiterM. P.SchaufeliW. B. (1996). Consistency of the burnout construct across occupations. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 9, 229–253.
23.
MaslachC.JacksonS. E. (1985). The role of sex and family variables in burnout. Sex Roles, 12, 837–851.
24.
McGeeM. K. (1996, March 4, 1996). Burnout! Information Week, 34–40.
25.
McLaneyM. A.HurrellJ. J. J. (1988). Control, stress, and job satisfaction in Canadian nurses. Work and Stress, 2(3), 217–224.
26.
MearesC. A.SargentJ. F. (1999). The digital workforce: Building infotech skills at the speed of innovation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, Office of Technology Policy.
27.
MooreJ. E. (2000). One road to turnover: An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 141–168.
28.
MooreJ. E.BurkeL. (2002). How to turn around ‘turnover culture’ in IT. Communications of the ACM, 45(2), 73–78.
29.
QuinnR.SeashoreS.KahnR.MangionT.CambellD.StainesG. (1971). Survey of Working Conditions: Final Report on Univariate and Bivariate Tables. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, Document No.2916-0001.
30.
SauterS.LimS. Y.MurphyL. R. (1996). Organizational Health: A New Paradigm for Occupational Stress at NIOSH. (Japanese Journal of) Occupational Mental Health, 4(4), 248–254.
31.
SeashoreS. E.LawlerE. E.MirvisP.CammannC. (Eds.). (1982). Observing and Measuring Organizational Change: A Guide to Field Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
SirgyM. J.EfratyD.SiegelP.LeeD.-J. (2001). A new measure of quality of working life (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Social Indicators Research, 55(3), 241–302.
33.
SmithM. J.Carayon-SainfortP. (1989). A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 4, 67–79.
34.
SwansonN. (1997, unpublished data). Unpublished raw data.
35.
TheorellT.KarasekR. A. (1996). Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 9–26.
36.
TristE. (1981). The Evaluation of Sociotechnical Systems. Toronto: Quality of Working Life Center.
