This field research project examined the claim that universally designed environments are significantly more usable by all consumers than equivalent non-universally designed environments. To test that claim, the project developed and tested two universal design outcome measures that examined subjective and objective indicators of environments' usability. These measures were then applied in case studies of buildings currently in use that varied in their design features' acknowledgment of the seven Principles of Universal Design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ConnellBJonesMMaceRMuellerJMullickAOstroffESanfordJSteinfeldEStoryMVanderheidenG (1997). The principles of universal design: Version 2.0. Raleigh, NC: The Center for Universal Design.
2.
DanfordG. S.SteinfeldE. (1999). Measuring the Influences of Physical Environments on the Behaviors of People with Impairments. In SteinfeldE.DanfordS. (Eds.) Measuring Enabling Environments. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. 111–137.
3.
DanfordG. S. (2001). Principles of Universal Design. In DanfordG. S.TaukeB. (Eds.) Universal Design New York. New York: New York City Mayor's Office for People with Disabilities. 19–24.
SteinfeldE.DanfordG. S. (2000). Measuring Handicapping Environments. In GreshamG. (Ed.) Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement: The State of the Art in the Year 2000 (Special issue), Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, Volume 4: 4, 5–8.
