Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study addresses the goal of an integrative approach to evaluating the effects on work of environmental design. Results are based on pre-occupancy evaluations of 2 different office workplaces, with many parallels in occupancy design. Methods entailed: (1) measurement of noise, lighting, and thermal conditions at selected work stations; and (2) administration of an occupancy quality perceptual response survey questionnaire. A 2-step, least-squares (2SLS) multiple regression method was used for sources of variance analysis of responses to occupancy quality items on the questionnaire. The major result is that observed variance in major indicators of occupancy quality is not explained by responses to the same questionnaire items for the 2 sites. The findings support the conclusion that, across different occupancy design settings, observed variability in work behavior is not likely attributable to a universal set of design factors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agricola

(1556). De re metallica (translated from the first Latin Edition by Hoover

H. C.

Hoover

L. H.

, London, Mining Magazine, 1912). Mineola, NY: Dover, 1986.

Charles

K. E.

Veitch

J. A.

Farley

K. M. J.

Newsham

G. R.

(2003). Environmental satisfaction in open-plan environments: 3. Further scale validation (IRC Research Report RR-152). Ottawa, ON: National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction.

Duffy

(1997). The new office. London: Conran Octopus Ltd.

Duval

C. L.

Charles

K. E.

Veitch

J. A.

(2002). Open-plan office density and environmental satisfaction (IRC Research Report RR-150). Ottawa, ON: National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction.

Lantrip

D. B.

(1993). Predicting satisfaction with the office environment by measuring constraints to worker activities. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 489–493. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Norušis

M. J.

(1997). SPSS professional statistics 7.5. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

Orfield

(September/October 2000). The open plan office. Facility Management Journal, 20–25.

Orfield

(November 2001). A better plan. ASID-ICON, 3(4), 31–35.

Parsons

K. C.

(2000). Environmental ergonomics: A review of principles, methods and models. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 581–594.

10.

Smith

T. J.

(1998). Context specificity in performance - the defining problem for human factors/ergonomics. In Proceedings of the human factors/ergonomics society 42nd annual meeting (pp. 692–696). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

11.

Smith

T. J.

Henning

R. H.

Smith

K. U.

(1994). Sources of performance variability. In Salvendy

Karwowski

(Eds.), Design of work and development of personnel in advanced manufacturing (Chap. 11, pp. 273–330). New York: Wiley.

12.

Veitch

J. A.

Farley

K. M. J.

Newsham

G. R.

(2002). Environmental satisfaction in open-plan environments: 1. Scale validation and method (IRC Research Report IR-844). Ottawa, ON: National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction.

13.

Veitch

J. A.

Charles

K. E.

Newsham

G. R.

Marquardt

C. J. G.

Geerts

(2003). Environmental satisfaction in open-plan environments: 5. Workstation and physical condition effects. (IRC Research Report RR-154). Ottawa, ON: National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction.

14.

Vischer

J. C.

(1989). Environmental quality in offices. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Sources of Variance in Employee Perceptions of Occupancy Quality

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References