A research study investigating user expectations, achievement, and satisfaction regarding twenty-five e-course components was conducted with 50 participants from 21 e-courses offered during the 2003 summer term at The University of Dayton. Qualitative and quantitative assessments were used to derive perceptions and rankings of course components relevant to facilitating learning, enhancing communication, and facilitating engagement in the e-courses. It may be concluded that a core set of course elements exists, which enables successful achievement and overall satisfaction for online learners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amichai-HamburgerY. (2002). Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 1–10.
2.
AvivR.GolanG. (1998). Pedagogical communication patterns in collaborative telelearning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 26(3), 201–208.
3.
BarrettE.LallyV. (1999). Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 48–60.
4.
BohlinR. M.HuntN. P. (1995). Course structure effects on students' computer anxiety, confidence, and attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 263–270.
5.
CanaryD. J.HauseK. S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication?Communication Quarterly, 41, 129–144.
6.
Carr-ChellmanA.DuchastelP. (2000). The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 229–241.
7.
ChenY-J. (2001). Dimensions of transactional distance in the World Wide Web learning environment: A factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 459–470.
8.
CleggS.TrayhurnD. (1999). Gender and computing: Not the same old problem. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 75–89.
9.
CollinsM.BergeZ. (1996). Facilitating interaction in computer mediated online courses. Paper for presentation at the FSU/AECT Distance Education Conference. Tallahassee, FL.
10.
CompeauD.HigginsC. A.HuffS. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145–158.
11.
DisethÅ.MartinsenØ. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23, 195–207.
12.
EastinM. S.LaRoseR. (2000, September). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer Medicated Communication, 6(1).
13.
ElversG.PolzellaD.GraetzK. (2003). Procrastination in online courses: Performance and attitudinal differences. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 159–162.
KayR. H. (1992). An examination of gender differences in computer attitudes, aptitude, and use. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
18.
LiawS. (2002). An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide Web: Relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 17–35.
19.
LockeE. A.FrederickE.LeeC.BobkoP. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241–251.
20.
MakiW. S.MakiR. H.PattersonM.WhittakerP. D. (2000). Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32, 230–239.
21.
NewmanF.ScurryJ. (2001, July 13). Online technology pushes pedagogy to the forefront. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, B7–B10.
SenkoC.HarachiewiczJ. M. (2002). Performance goals: The moderating of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 603–610.
