Adjustable stops are available on many weightlifting machines, and have the potential to prevent some injuries that occur during exercise. The safety benefit depends in large part on whether and how the stops are used. Unobtrusive observations at health clubs indicate that most patrons fail to use the adjustable stops. Advantages and disadvantages of several approaches to injury prevention are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyresT.GrossM.FowlerG.McCarthyR.KalinowskiA.LauE. (1991). Evaluation of potential safety modifications by review of accident reports. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society.
2.
AyresT. J.WoodC. T.SchmidtR. A.YoungD. E.MurrayJ. (1998). Effectiveness of warning labels and signs: An update on compliance research. Proceedings of the Silicon Valley Ergonomics Conference & Exposition, 199–205.
3.
CPSC. Data from the National Electronic Emergency Surveillance System.
4.
CPSC (2000). Baby boomer sports injuries.
5.
CampbellB. J. (1987). The relationship of seat belt law enforcement to level of belt use. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, HSRC-TR72.
6.
DingusT. A.HathawayJ. A.HunnB. P. (1991). A most critical warning variable: Two demonstrations of the powerful effects of cost on warning compliance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, 1034–1038.
7.
GomerF. E. (1986). Evaluating the effectiveness of warnings under prevailing working conditions. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting, 712–715.
LehtoM. R.FoleyJ. P. (1991). Risk-taking, warning labels, training, and regulation: Are they associated with the use of helmets by all-terrain vehicle riders?. Journal of Safety Research, 22, 191–200.
10.
PizialiR.AyresT.PaverJ.FowlerG.McCarthyR. (1993). Investigation of the net safety impact of an occupant protection system for all-terrain vehicles. Presented at the 1993 Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress, Detroit, Paper No. 930208.
