Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

On the basis of Fitts' law the present study examined the psychomotor efficiency for 20 experienced users of force- (trackpoint) and motion-input (touchpad) devices in clicking and dragging tasks. Beyond task difficulty the impact of input modality, practice, and task type was investigated. On the one hand, the results support Fitts' law since performance data of both input devices fitted satisfyingly with Fitts' predictions. Motion-input was found to be very robust towards task difficulty, especially in dragging tasks. On the other hand, the results were incompatible to Fitts' assumptions as target size and distance did not equally contribute to task difficulty but rather target size was a stronger contributor. Thus, the effective task difficulty in small targets was notably underestimated. For user-friendly interfaces, button widths of over 0.5 cm should be provided, especially when distances farther than 7.5 cm are inevitable.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Accot

Zhai

(2003). Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing. Proceedings of the CHI′03 (pp. 193–200). New York: ACM.

Armbrüster

Sutter

Ziefle

(in press). Target size and distance: Important factors for designing user interfaces for older notebook users. WWCS.

Card

S. K.

English

W. K.

Burr

(1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21 (8), 601–613.

Dell (2004). http://support.jp.dell.com/docs/systems/pcor/jpnjap_ug/touchpad.htm.

Douglas

S. A.

Mithal

A. K.

(1997). The ergonomics of computer pointing devices. New York: Springer.

EN ISO 9241-9 (2000). German Version of ISO 9241-9: 2000. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals – Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.

Farris

Jones

Anders

(2001). Acquisition speed with targets on the edge of the screen: An application of Fitts' law to commonly used web browser controls. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual Meeting, pp. 1205–1209. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Fitts

P. M.

(1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 (6), 381–391.

Fitts

P. M.

Peterson

J. R.

(1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67 (2), 103–112.

10.

IBM (2004). http://trackpoint.almaden.ibm.com/gifs/page9.gif.

11.

Langolf

G. D.

Chaffin

D. B.

Foulke

J. A.

(1976). An investigation of Fitts' Law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8 (2), 113–128.

12.

MacKenzie

(1992). Fitts' Law as research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 91–139.

13.

MacKenzie

Buxton

(1994). The prediction of pointing and dragging times in graphical user interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 6, 213–227.

14.

Sutter

Ziefle

(2003). How to handle notebook input devices: An insight in button use strategy. In McCabe

P. T.

(Ed.). Contemporary Ergonomics, 241–246. London: Taylor & Francis.

Psychomotor Efficiency in Users of Notebook Input Devices: Confirmation and Restrictions of Fitts' Law as an Evaluative Tool for User-Friendly Design

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References