Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present display technology transition in computing from CRT to LCD monitors poses many human factors research questions. In this study, computer monitor technologies were compared, using two CRT and two active-matrix LCD monitors under four lighting levels. Ten participants took part in a 4times4 within-subjects experimental design where they performed word processing, data entry, and web-browsing tasks. Results show that one of the LCD monitors was associated with poorer performance on the word processing task than an equivalent grouping of the other three monitors. Thus, it is concluded that active-matrix LCD monitors are capable of equitable performance with the traditional CRT technology, but it is uncertain whether the technologies themselves are equivalent. Lighting was another significant effect, with the dark (0 lux) and very bright (1200 lux) conditions causing poorer performance. There was no interactive effect between monitors and lighting. The battery of tasks used in this study, representative of office work, is also discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BSR/HFES100. (2002). Human Factors Engineering of Computer Workstations: Standard for Trial Use. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc.

Henning

R. A.

Callaghan

E. A.

Guttman

J. I.

Braun

H. A.

(1995). “Evaluation of Two Self-Managed Rest Break Systems for VDT Users.” Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. pp. 780–784.

Law

(2003, June 26). “LCDs gain ground against CRT monitors, study finds.” InfoWorld. Retrieved February 7, 2004, from http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/06/26/HNlcds_1.html.

Magnussen

Dyrnes

Greenlee

M. W.

Nordby

Watten

(1992). “Time course of contrast adaptation to VDU-displayed text.” Behaviour and Information Technology. 11 (6), pp. 334–337.

Megaw

E. D.

(1995). “The definition and measurement of visual fatigue.” In Wilson

J. R.

Corlett

E. N.

(Eds.). Evaluation of Human Work: Second Edition (pp. 840–863). London: Taylor and Francis, Ltd.

Menozzi

Napflin

Krueger

(1999). “CRT vs. LCD: A pilot study on visual performance and suitability of two display technologies for use in office work.” Displays. 30, pp. 3–10.

Probst

(2000). Effects of Privacy Filter Use on Horizontal Deviations in Head Position. Unpublished Master's thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

Shieh

K. K.

Lin

C. C.

(2000). “Effects of screen type, ambient illumination, and color combination on VDT visual performance and subjective preference.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 26, pp. 527–536.

Simmons

Manahan

(1999). “The Effects of Monitor Size on User Performance and Preference.” Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

LCD vs. CRT: Effects on Performance of Office Work

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References