Managing Metadata in Collaborative Command and Control Analysis

Abstract

When analyzing field trials to examine command and control, there is a great need for means of presenting, coordinating, exploring and analyzing large amounts of data captured from multiple sources. The products of this analysis include insights, reflections, questions, and hypotheses. From an epistemological point of view, it is crucial to maintain a solid chain of reasoning from the data captured in the field, through the presentation formats used in the analysis process, and to the results of the analysis delivered to the clients. To this end, we present the Metadata Workbench, which manages metadata in command and control analysis. This analysis tool embeds metadata in contextual information, coordinates them in time, and links them to the supporting data. Using the tool, multiple analysts, experts, and researchers can exchange comments on both data and metadata in a collaborative and explorative investigation of a complex scenario. The tool is implemented as a component in the Mind framework and is demonstrated using data from distributed tactical operations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albinsson

P.-A.

Dahlbäck

Morin

(2004). Coupling models of complexity and models of cognition in a systems design process. To be presented at the 12th European conference on cognitive ergonomics, September 12-15, York, UK.

Albinsson

P.-A.

Morin

Fransson

(2003). Finding information needs in military command and control systems using exploratory tools for communication analysis. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, October 13-17, Denver, USA, 1918-1922.

Andersson

Skagert

(2004). Managing massive datasets from distributed tactical operations. MSc Thesis, Linköping: Linköpings universitet, Sweden.

Hollan

Hutchins

Kirsh

(2000). Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction (7) 2, 174–196.

Hutchins

(1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Jenvald

(1999). Methods and Tools in Computer-Supported Taskforce Training. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology: PhD Dissertation No 598, Linköping: Linköpings universitet, Sweden.

Klein

(1998). Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Miller

Patterson

Woods

(2001). Critiquing as a Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) Methodology. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, October 8-12, Minneapolis, USA, 518–522.

Morin

(2002a). Multimedia representations of distributed tactical operations. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology: PhD Dissertation No 771, Linköping: Linköpings universitet, Sweden.

10.

Morin

(2002b). Modeling distributed tactical operations for command and control analysis. Proceedings of the first Swedish-American Workshop on Modeling and Simulation, October 30-31, Orlando, USA.

11.

Morin

Jenvald

Thorstensson

(2000). Computer-supported visualization of rescue operations. Safety Science, 35(1-3), 3–27.

12.

Sanderson

Scott

Johnston

Mainzer

Watanabe

James

(1994). MacSHAPA and the enterprise of exploratory sequential data analysis (ESDA), International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41, 633–681.

13.

Suchman

(1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.

14.

Woods

(1988). Coping with complexity: The psychology of human behavior in complex systems. Goodstein

L. P.

Andersen

H. B.

Olsen

S. E.

(Eds.). Tasks, Errors and Mental Models. London: Taylor Francis, 128–148.

15.

Woods

(1993). Process-tracing methods for the study of cognition outside of the experimental psychology laboratory. In Klein

G. A.

Orasanu

Calderwood

Zsambok

C. E.

(Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods, Norwood: Ablex, 228–251.

16.

Woods

(2003). Discovering How Distributed Cognitive Systems Work. In Hollnagel

, (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

17.

Xiao

Vicente

(2000) A framework for epistemological analysis in empirical (laboratory and field) studies. Human Factors, 42(1), 87–101.

18.

Zsambok

Klein

(Eds.). (1997). Naturalistic decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.