The Effect of Frequent versus Infrequent Interruptions on Primary Task Resumption

Abstract

Recent interruptions research suggests that the timing of interruptions can play a critical role in the level of task primary disruption. An unanswered question regarding interruption timing is whether greater task disruption in terms of primary task resumption time is experienced with more frequent interruptions. The present study used a VCR programming task with a pursuit-tracking interruption task to measure how quickly people resume the primary task after an interruption. The results showed that primary task resumption times were faster for more frequent interruptions, which was contrary to the predicted outcome. In addition, frequent interruptions did not result in the more resumption errors or longer time-on-task results as predicted. These results are discussed as evidence that more frequent interruptions may compel people to adopt aggressive goal maintenance strategies when dealing with interruptions, but further research is required to fully test this hypothesis.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmann

E. M.

Trafton

J. G.

(2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39–83.

Cellier

J.-M.

Eyrolle

(1992) Interference between switched tasks, Ergonomics, 35 (1), 25–36.

Czerwinski

Cutrell

Horvitz

(2000) Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. Paris

Ozkan

Howard

(Eds.), Proceedings of OZCHI 2000: Interfacing Reality in the New Millennium. Academic Press (pp. 356–361).

Gellatly

Kleiss

(2000). Visual attention demand evaluation of conventional and multifunction in-vehicle information systems. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (pp. 282–285). Santa Monica: HFES.

Gillie

Broadbent

(1989) What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity, Psychological Research, 50 (4), 243–250.

Gray

W. D.

(2000). The nature and processing of errors in interactive behavior. Cognitive Science, 24(2), 205–248.

Gray

W. D.

W.-T.

(2001). Ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head: Implications of rational analysis for interface design. Proceedings of the ACM CHI'01 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Hess

S. M.

Detweiler

M. C.

(1994). Training to reduce the disruptive effects of interruptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, (pp. 1173–1177). Santa Monica: HFES.

Latorella

K. A.

(1998). Effects of modality on interrupted flight deck performance: Implications for data link. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: HFES.

10.

McFarlane

D. C.

(2002). Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human–computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 63–139.

11.

McFarlane

D.C.

Latorella

K. A.

(2002) The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design, Human-Computer Interaction, 17 (1), 1–61.

12.

Miyata

Norman

D. A.

(1986). Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In Norman

D. A.

Draper

S. W.

(Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 265–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

13.

Monk

C. A.

Boehm-Davis

D. A.

Trafton

J. G.

(2002). The attentional costs of interrupting task performance at various stages. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 1824–1828). Santa Monica: HFES.

14.

Rogers

Monsell

(1995). Costs of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.

15.

Speier

Valacich

Vessey

(1999). The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload perspective. Decision Sciences, 30 (2), 337–360.

16.

Trafton

J. G.

Altmann

E. M.

Brock

D. P.

Mintz

(2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 583–603.

17.

Zijlstra

F. R. H.

Roe

R. A.

Leonora

A. B.

Krediet

(1999). Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(2), 164–185.