Previous research has demonstrated the importance of spatial abilities in the performance of computer-based tasks, most of which involve menu navigation. This has been found among younger and older adults. Spatial abilities are usually thought to be composed of two distinct sub-factors: spatial visualization and spatial orientation. Various spatial abilities have been shown to exhibit normative declines with age suggesting that older adults may have trouble using computer-based technologies. The current research aims to examine the role of the different types of spatial abilities in the successful use of telephone menu systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CampagnoniF. R.EhrlichK. (1989). Information retrieval using a hypertext-based help system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 7(3), 271–291.
2.
ChenC.RadaR. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11(2), 125–156.
3.
CzajaS. J.SharitJ.OwnbyR.RothD. L.NairS. (2001). Examining age differences in performance of a complex information search and retrieval task. Psychology and Aging, 16, 564–579.
4.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanH. H.DermenD. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5.
GarfeinA. J.SchaieK. W.WillisS. L. (1988). Microcomputer proficiency in later-middle-aged and older adults: Teaching old dogs new tricks. Social Behavior, 3(2), 131–148.
6.
GilbertK. D.RogersW. A. (1999). Age-related differences in the acquisition, utilization, and extension of a spatial mental model. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 5, 246–255.
7.
GomezL. M.EganD. E.BowersC. (1986). Learning to use a text editor: Some learner characteristics that predict success. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–23.
8.
MeadS. E.SpauldingV. A.SitR. A.MeyerE.WalkerN. (1997). Effects of age and training on World Wide Web navigation strategies, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 152–156), Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.RettingerD. A.ShahP.HegartyH. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621–640.
10.
PakR. (2001). A further examination of the influence of spatial abilities on computer task performance in younger and older adults. Unpublished master's thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
RogersW. A. (1996). Assessing age-related differences in the long-term retention of skills. In RogersW. A.FiskA. D.Aging and skilled performance: Advances in theory and applications. (pp. 185–200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
SalthouseT. A. (1992). Reasoning and spatial abilities. In CraikF. I. M.SalthouseT. A.The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 167–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
SalthouseT. A.BabcockR. L.MitchellD. R. D.PalmonR.SkovronekR. (1990). Sources of individual differences in spatial visualization ability. Intelligence, 14, 187–230.
15.
SharitJ.CzajaS. J.NairS.LeeC. (in press). Assessing Age Differences in Information Search and Retrieval Using Telephone Voice Menu Systems. Human Factors.
16.
VicenteK. J.HayesB. C.WilligesR. C. (1987). Assaying and isolating individual differences in searching a hierarchical files system. Human Factors, 29(3), 349–359.
17.
WillisS. L.SchaieK. W. (1986). Training the elderly on the ability factors of spatial orientation and inductive reasoning. Psychology and Aging, 1(3), 239–247.
18.
WochingerK.Boehm-DavisD. (1995). The effects of age, spatial ability, and navigational information on navigational performance. (FHA Publication No. FHWA-RD-95166). McLean, VA: U. S. Department of Transportation.
