Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A survey of 57 ergonomists in California and 28 ergonomists in New York State compared which of 19 ergonomic methods were used to assess potential injury risks. Results showed great variability in methods chosen by practitioners both within and between States. The Cal/OSHA regulation apparently has not standardized method selection in California. Apart from use of the NIOSH lifting equation for assessments of lifting and the Borg RPE scale for assessing exertion, there was no evidence of any standardization among practitioners in either State. There was no consensus on methods for assessing posture, repetitiveness, or force. Significant confusion was found among California practitioners regarding the content of the current Cal/OSHA regulation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buckle

(1996) User needs in exposure assessment for musculoskeletal risk assessment. Virtual Proc. CybErg 1996: 1st int. cyberspace conf. on ergonomics.

Fransson-Hall

Gloria

Kilbom

Winkel

Larlqvist

Wiktorin

(1995). A portable ergonomic observation method (PEO) for computerized online recording of postures and manual handling. App. Erg., 26(2), 93–100.

Hagberg

(1992). Exposure variables in ergonomic epidemiology. Am. J. of Ind. Med., 21(1), 91–100.

Kilbom

(1994). Assessment of physical exposure in relation to work-related musculoskeletal disorders — what information can be obtained from systematic observations? Scand. J. of Work Env. Health, 20, 30–45.

Buckle

(1998). A practical method for the assessment of work-related musculoskeletal risks — Quick Exposure Check (QEC). Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society's 42nd Annual Meeting, 2, 1351–1355.

Mattila

M. K.

(1985). Job load and hazard analysis: A method for the analysis of workplace conditions for occupational health care. Br. J Ind. Med., 42(10), 656–666.

National Research Council. (1986). Research needs for human factors. Report of the committee on human factors Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press: National Research Council.

Punnet

Keyserling

W. M.

(1987). Exposure to ergonomic stressors in the garment industry: Application and critique of job site analysis methods. Ergonomics, 30(7), 1099–1116.

Radwin

R. G.

Lin

M. L.

Yen

T. Y.

(1994). Exposure assessment of biomechanical stress in repetitive manual work using frequency-weighted filters. Ergonomics, 37(12), 1984–1998.

Effects of Regulations on the Choice of Ergonomic Methods: A Comparative Survey of California and New York Ergonomists

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References