Relating Ability and Personality to the Efficacy and Performance of Dyadic Teams

Abstract

We examined the extent to which member ability and personality relate to differences in team performance and team efficacy in a task setting that simulated the high degree of role interdependence and human-technology interaction found in many military contexts. 168 male participants were assigned to dyadic teams and trained for two weeks to learn and perform a complex computer task that simulated the demands of a dynamic aviation environment. Participants also completed measures of general mental ability, psychomotor ability, and the Big Five personality traits (extraversion, openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability). Team performance and team efficacy were assessed multiple times throughout training. Results indicated that ability was a critical determinant of both performance and efficacy, and personality traits yielded an incremental contribution to both performance and efficacy. In particular, psychomotor ability and conscientiousness were the strongest and most consistent factors associated with team effectiveness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Barrick

M. R.

Stewart

G. L.

Neubert

M. J.

Mount

M. K.

(1998).Relating member ability and personality to work-team process and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377–391.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Salas

Blickensderfer

E. L.

(1998). Making fine distinctions among team constructs: Worthy endeavor or “Crewel” and unusual punishment? In R. Klimoski (Chair), When is a work team a crew and does it matter? Symposium presented at the 13th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.

Devine

D. J.

Philips

J. L.

(2001). Do smarter teams do better? A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Research, 32, 507–532.

Driskell

J. E.

Hogan

Salas

(1987). Personality and group performance. In Hendrick

Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91–112). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.

Gopher

Weil

Bareket

(1994). The transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to actual flight. Human Factors, 36, 387–405.

Gopher

Weil

Siegel

(1989). Practice under changing priorities: An approach to the training of complex skills. Acta Psychologica, 71, 147–177.

Gully

S. M.

Incalcaterra

K. A.

Joshi

Beaubien

J. M.

(2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832.

10.

Guzzo

Dickson

M. W.

(1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338.

11.

Hackman

J. R.

(1987). The design of work teams. In Lorsch

J. W.

Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

12.

Hart

S. G.

Battiste

(1992). Field test of a video game trainer. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, 2, 1291–1295.

13.

Hurtz

G. M.

Donovan

J. J.

(2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 869–879.

14.

Mane

A. M.

Donchin

(1989). The Space Fortress game. Acta Psychologica, 71, 17–22.

15.

McGrath

J. E.

(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

16.

McGrath

J. E.

Berdahl

J. L.

Arrow

(1995). Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: Dynamics of diversity in workgroups. In Jackson

S. E.

Ruderman

M. N.

Diversity in workteams: Research paradigms for changing workplace (pp. 17–45. Washington, DC: APA Press.

17.

Neuman

G. A.

Wright

(1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376–389.

18.

Raven

J. C.

Court

J. H.

Raven

(1985). A manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. London: H. K. Lewis.

19.

Salas

Bowers

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

(1995). Military team research: 10 years of progress. Military Psychology, 7, 55–75.

20.

Steiner

I. D.

(1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.

21.

Tziner

Eden

J. C.

(1985). Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 85–93.