The present study evaluated response time and accuracy to answer a series of questions of information in 16 (8 older and 8 newer ‘Drug Facts’) over-the-counter (OTC) drug labels. The newer labels include aspects, based on previous research, which should benefit performance. The results indicated that participant's response times were significantly faster with the newer labels compared to the older ones. However, this was not true of all OTC product samples. Accuracy was high (error rate low) for both label formats. Response times for females were significantly faster than males for both label types. The benefits of formatting text for facilitating information acquisition from drug labels and other kinds of printed information are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CheathamD.B.WogalterM.S. (2002). Reported likelihood of reading over-the-counter (OTC) medication labeling and contacting a physician. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46, 1452–1456.
2.
EverettS.E. (1991). Lay audience response to prescription drug advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 43–49.
3.
FDA Format and Content Requirements for Over-the-Counter (OTC) Drug Product Labeling, 21 C.F.R. § 201.66 (2001).
4.
Food and Drug Administration [FDA]. (1999). Over the-counter human drugs; labeling requirements; final rule. Federal Register, 64(51), 13253–13303.
5.
Food and Drug Administration [FDA] (2002). New OTC drug facts label. FDA Consumer, 34(4).
6.
GoldbergJ.H.ProbartC.K.ZakR.E. (1999). Visual search for food nutrition labels. Human Factors, 41, 425–437.
7.
KalsherM.J.WogalterM.S.RacicotB.M. (1996). Pharmaceutical container labels: Enhancing preference perceptions with alternative designs and pictorials. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 18, 83–90.
8.
LarueC.CohenH.H. (1987). Factors affecting consumer's perceptions of product warnings: An examination of the differences between male and female consumers. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 31, 610–614.
9.
MorrowD.G.LeirerV.O.SheikhJ. (1988). Adherence and medication instructions: Review and recommendations. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 36, 1147–1160.
10.
VigilanteW.J.Jr.WogalterM.S. (1997). The preferred order of over-the-counter (OTC) pharmaceutical label components. Drug Information Journal, 31, 973–988.
11.
VigilanteW.J.Jr.WogalterM.S. (1999). Over-the-counter (OTC) drug labeling: Format preferences. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43, 103–107.
12.
WogalterM.S.ForbesR.M.BarlowT. (1993). Alternative product label designs: Increasing the surface area and print size. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40, 181–186.
13.
WogalterM.S.KalsherM.J. (1994). Product label list format: Effects of item arrangement and completeness on comparison time and accuracy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38, 389–393.
14.
WogalterM.S.MagurnoA.B.DietrichD.A.ScottK.L. (1999). Enhancing information acquisition for over-the-counter medications by making better use of container surface space. Experimental Aging Research, 25, 27–48.
15.
WogalterM.S.ShaverE.F. (2001). Evaluation of list vs. paragraph text format on search time for warning symptoms in a product manual. In BittnerA. C.Jr.ChampneyP. C.MorrisseyS. J.Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety 4 (pp. 434–438. London: Taylor and Francis.
16.
WogalterM.S.ShaverE.F.ChanL.S. (2002). List vs. paragraph formats on time to compare nutrition labels. In McCabeP. T.Advances in Ergonomics 2002 (pp. 458–462. London: Taylor & Francis.
17.
WogalterM.S.VigilanteW.J.Jr. (2003). Effects of label format on knowledge acquisition and perceived readability by younger and older adults. Ergonomics, 46, 327–344.
18.
WogalterM.S.YoungS.L. (1994). Enhancing warning compliance through alternative product label designs. Applied Ergonomics, 24, 53–57.
