The Postural Comfort Zone for Reaching Gestures

Abstract

We have proposed a method for objective assessment of postural comfort (Kölsch et al., 2003). We defined comfort as the range of postures that is voluntarily assumed despite the availability of other postures. Designing user interfaces within the limits of comfort zones can avert risks associated with unknown alternative use patters of the interface.

Here we report on a user study that investigated the comfort zone for free-hand gestures in the horizontal plane at about stomach height. This space is of particular interest to novel technologies such as gesture recognition and virtual reality. The results are in line with previous studies on postural discomfort, but improve on resolution and are not based on subjective, questionnaire-based data acquisition. This study also serves as an example for how to design studies for comfort evaluation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buxton

Fiume

Hill

Lee

Woo

Continuous Hand-Gesture Driven Input. Proceedings of Graphics Interface '83, 9th Conference of the Canadian Man-Computer Communications Society, Edmonton, 191–195, 1983.

Chaffin

D. B.

Localized Muscle Fatigue — Definition and Measurement. Journal of Occupational Medicine 15(4), 346–354, 1973.

Chaffin

D. B.

Andersson

G. B.

Journal of Occupational Biomechanics John Wiley & Sons, 1984.

Chung

M. K.

Lee

Kee

Kim

S. H.

A Postural Workload Evaluation System Based on a Macro- postural Classification. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 12(3), 267–277, 2002.

Cutler

Turk

View-based Interpretation of Real-time Optical Flow for Gesture Recognition. Proc. 1998 IEEE Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 1998.

Fikes

T. G.

System Architecture Analysis for Reaching and Grasping. University of California, Santa Barbara, PhD Thesis, 1993.

Fitts

P. M.

The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 381–391, 1954.

Grandjean

Fitting the task to the man. An Ergonomic Approach. Taylor & Francis Ltd, London, 1969.

Hinckley

Pausch

Goble

J. C.

Kassell

N. F.

A Survey of Design Issues in Spatial Input. Proc. ACM Symposium on UIST, 213–222, 1994.

10.

Hinckley

Pausch

Proffitt

Kassell

N. F.

Two-handed virtual manipulation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (5) 3, 260–302, 1998.

11.

Kee

A method for analytically generating three-dimensional isocomfort workspace based on perceived discomfort. Applied Ergonomics, 33(1), 51–62, 2002.

12.

Kölsch

Turk

Keyboards without Keyboards: A Survey of Virtual Keyboard Implementations. SIMS, 2002, at http://www.create.ucsb.edu/sims/Proceedings.html .

13.

Kölsch

Beall

Turk

An Objective Measure for Postural Comfort. In Proc. HFES 47th Annual Meeting (this publication), 2003.

14.

Pausch

Williams

R. D.

Tailor: Creating Custom User Interfaces Based on Gesture. Proc. 3rd ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 1990.

15.

Pierce

J. S.

Stearns

Pausch

Two Handed Manipulation of Voodoo Dolls in Virtual Environments. Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 141–145, 1999.

16.

Pope

S. T.

Engberg

Holm

The Distributed Processing Environment for High-Performance Distributed Multimedia Applications. Proc. 2001 IEEE Multimedia Technology and Appl. Conf., 2001.

17.

Rosenbaum

D. A.

Meulenbroek

R. J.

Vaughan

Jansen

Posture-Based Motion Planning: Applications to Grasping. Psychological Review (108) 4, 709–734, 2001.

18.

Salvendy

Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, 1997.

19.

Tichauer

E. R.

The Biomechanical Basis of Ergonomics. John Wiley & Sons, 1978.

20.

Wiker

S. F.

Langolf

G. D.

Chaffin

D. B.

Arm Posture and Human Movement Capability. Human Factors 31(4). 421–441, 1989.

21.

Woodson

W. E.

Human Factors Design Handbook, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill Professional, 1992.