Gain and Target Size Effects on Cursor-Positioning Time with a Mouse

Abstract

Movement time to align a cursor with targets on a computer screen a mouse was examined across settings of gain and target size. Empirical evidence was sought in light of previous suggestions that performance declines observed at higher gains can be explained by decreased effective cursor resolution, not gain per se. We tested this hypothesis by holding the effective cursor resolution constant while systematically varying gain and target size. Analysis of movement times showed a significant gain effect as a function of target size. Specifically, movement time increased with gain at the smallest target size (i.e. 1.5 mm) but decreased with gain at the largest target size (i.e. 12 mm). These results do not support the no-effect of gain hypothesis and suggest that target size is an important factor in determining the effects of gain on mouse movement performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baird

K.M

Hoffman

E.R.

Drury

C.G.

(2002). The effect of probe length on Fitts' law. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 9–14.

Buck

, (1980). Motor performance in relation to control-display gain and target width. Ergonomics, 23 (6), 579–589.

Jellinek

H.D.

Card

S.K.

(2002) Power mice and user performance. In Proceedings of ACM CHI '90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 213–220.

Fitts

P.M.

(1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

Langolf

(1973). Human motor performance in precise microscopic work — development of standard data for microscopic assembly work. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Michigan.

Lin

M.L.

Radwin

R.G.

Vanderheiden

G.C.

(1992). Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device. Ergonomics, 35 (2), 159–175.