Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although a wide range of display devices is used in virtual environment (VE) systems, no guidelines exist to choose an appropriate display for a particular VE application. Our goal in this research is to develop such guidelines on the basis of empirical results. In this paper, we present a preliminary experiment comparing human behavior and performance between a head-mounted display (HMD) and a four-sided spatially immersive display (SID). In particular, we studied users' preferences for real vs. virtual turns in the VE. The results indicate that subjects have a significant preference for real turns in the HMD and for virtual turns in the SID. The experiment also found that females are more likely to choose real turns than males. We suggest that HMDs are an appropriate choice when users perform frequent turns and require spatial orientation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bakker

Werkhoven

Passenier

(1998). Aiding Orientation Performance in Virtual Environments with Proprioceptive Feedback. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia: IEEE Computer Society Press, 28–35.

Brooks

(1999). What's Real About Virtual Reality?, IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 19(6), 16–27.

Chance

Gaunet

Beall

A. C.

Loomis

J. M.

(1998). Locomotion Mode Affects the Updating of Objects Encountered During Travel, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(2), 168–178.

Cruz-Neira

Sandin

DeFanti

(1993). Surround-Screen Projection-Based Virtual Reality: The Design and Implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1993.

Davis

(1996). Visual Requirements in HMDs: What Can We See and What Do We Need to See?, In Melzer

Moffitt

(Ed.) Head-Mounted Displays: Designing for the User, McGraw-Hill: New York, 207–249.

Kijima

Ojika

(1997). Transition Between Virtual Environment and Workstation Environment with Projective Head Mounted Display. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Albuquerque, New Mexico: IEEE Computer Society Press, 130–137.

Kruger

Bohn

C. A.

Frohlich

Schuth

Strauss

Wesche

(1995). The Responsive Workbench: A Virtual Work Environment. IEEE Computer, 28(7), 42–48.

Lantz

(1996). The Future of Virtual Reality: Head Mounted Displays versus Spatially Immersive Displays. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH: ACM Press, 485–486.

LaViola

Feliz

D. A.

Keefe

D. F.

Zeleznik

R. C.

(2001). Hands-Free Multi-Scale Navigation in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 9–15.

10.

Meyer

Barr

(1999). ALCOVE: Design and Implementation of an Object-Centric Virtual Environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, Houston, Texas: IEEE Computer Society Press, 46–52.

11.

Pausch

Shackelford

Proffitt

(1993). A User Study Comparing Head-Mounted and Stationary Displays. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 41–45.

12.

Witmer

Singer

(1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240.

Empirical Comparison of Human Behavior and Performance with Different Display Devices for Virtual Environments

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References