Computerized Card Sort Training Tool: Is it Comparable to Manual Card Sorting?

Abstract

One way to determine training needs and to evaluate learning is to measure how trainees organize knowledge using a card sorting task. While card sorting is a valid tool for assessing knowledge organization, it can be work intensive and error-prone when it is manually administered. For this reason, we developed a software tool that computerizes the card sort task. We present a study that was conducted to determine whether the computerized version of card sorting is comparable to the manual sort. One-hundred eight participants completed two card sorts, either two manual sorts, one manual and one computerized sort, or two computerized sorts. No differences were found between the administration methods with respect to card sort accuracy, test-retest scores, and number of piles created. Differences between the two methods were found in administration time and length of the pile labels. These differences disappeared after one computerized administration. We conclude that a computerized card sorting task is just as effective at eliciting knowledge as a manual card sort.