The focus of this research is on the effect of human trust in a hybrid inspection system with different levels of error randomness. The experimental designs were developed to conduct inspection tasks with four levels of error randomness, and subjects were requested to rate their trust at different levels in the system. Each randomness level comprised of stages, and human trust variation for each stage was observed. These levels were administered through the use of a hybrid inspection simulator. Analysis of the results revealed that human trust in the hybrid inspection system is sensitive to error randomness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarberB., 1983, The Logic and Limits of Trust (Rutgers university Press, New Brunswick, NJ).
2.
BullingerH. J.SalvendyG., 1987, Human Aspects of Robotic Systems. In Handbook of Human Factors (Ed.: SalvendyG.). John Wiley and Sons, New York.
3.
ChinR. T., 1986, Algorithms and techniques for automated visual inspection, Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Image Processing, YoungT.EuK. S. (eds.) (Academic Press).
4.
DruryC. G., 1978, Integrating human factors in statistical quality control, Human Factors, 20 (5), 561–570.
5.
DruryC. G., 1984, Improving inspection performance, in Handbook of Industrial Engineering, SalvendyG. (ed.) (John Wiley and Sons.).
6.
HouTung-HsuLinLiColnDrury G., 1993, An empirical study of hybrid inspection systems and allocation of inspection functions, International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 351–367.
7.
MasterReenaGramopadhyeA.K.BinghamJamieJiangXiaochun, 2000. A Questionnaire for Measuring Trust in Hybrid Inspection Systems, Submitted to IERC.
8.
MorrisNancyRouseWilliamSharonWard, 1988, Studies of Dynamic Task Allocation on an Aerial Search Environment, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18, 376–389.
9.
MuirB. M., 1994, Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems, Ergonomics, 37 (11), 1905–1922.
10.
NewmanTimothyS.JainAnil K., 1995, A survey of automated visual inspection, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61 (2), 231–262.
11.
RempelJ. K.HolmesJ. G.ZannaM. P., 1985, Trust in close relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–122.
12.
SharkJ.ElhenceS., 1987, Technical and Human Aspects of Computer-Aided Manufacturing. In Handbook of Human Factors (Ed.: SalvendyG.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 1243–1268.
13.
SheridanT. B., 1986, Supervisory control, in Handbook of Human Factors (Wiley, New York).
14.
SheridanT. B.HennessyR. T., 1984, Research and Modeling of Supervisory Control Behavior (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).
15.
SinclairM. A., 1984, Ergonomics of quality control. Workshop document, International Conference on Occupation Ergonomics (Toronto).
16.
ThapaVijay B.GramopadhyeA.K.BrianMelloyLarryGrimes, 1996, Evaluation of different training strategies to improve decision making performance in inspection, The International Journal of Human factors in Manufacturing, 6 (3), 243–261.
17.
ZuboffS., (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, New York).
