Perceived Urgency,Alerting Effectiveness and Annoyance of Verbal Collision Avoidance System Messages

Abstract

Despite extensive examination of display parameters affecting written and nonverbal warnings, few investigators have examined presentation parameters affecting auditorially presented verbal warnings. This investigation is the first systematic examination of display parameters affecting verbal warnings that required listeners to be engaged in a contextually appropriate simultaneous task. Participants responded to verbal collision avoidance system (CAS) messages while engaged in a simultaneous simulated driving task. Perceived urgency, alerting effectiveness and annoyance ratings and behavioral reaction times were examined as a function of the signal word, CAS message, and presentation level (PL). Consistent with predictions from previous research involving written warnings, differences in the perceived urgency were observed as a function of the signal word used. PL also significantly impacted perceived urgency and alerting effectiveness. CAS messages presented at a S/N ratio of at least +4 dB resulted in high ratings of perceived urgency ratings and were responded too relatively quickly without a substantial tradeoff in increased annoyance ratings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barzegar

R. S.

Wogalter

M. S.

(1998). Effects of auditorily-presented warning signal words on intended carefulness. In Hanson

M.A.

(Ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics, 1998, (pp 311–315). Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society. London, UK: Ergonomics Society.

Brown

T. L.

Lee

J. D.

Hoffman

(2001). The effect of rear-end collision warnings on on-going response. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 45th Annual Meeting-2001, (pp. 1646–1650) (Held October 2001 in Minneapolis, MN). Santa Barbara, CA: HFES.

Brown

T.L.

Lee

J.D.

McGehee

D.V.

(2001). Human Performance Models and Rear-End Collision Avoidance Algorithms. Human Factors, 43(3), 462–482.

Charness

Bosman

E. A.

(1992). Human factors and age. In Craik

F.I.M.

Salthouse

T.A.

(Eds.), Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Edworthy

Adams

(1996). Warning Design: A Research Prospective. London: Taylor & Francis.

Edworthy

Loxley

S. L.

Dennis

I. D.

(1991). Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human Factors, 33(2), 205–231.

Hancock

P. A.

Parasuraman

Byrne

E. A.

(1996). Driver-centered issues in advanced automation for motor vehicles. In Parasuraman

Mouloua

, (Eds.), Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hellier

Wright

D. B.

Edworthy

Newstead

(2000). On the stability of the arousal strength of warning signals. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 577–592.

Hollander

T. D.

Wogalter

M. S.

(2000). Connoted hazard of voiced warning signal words: An examination of auditory components. In the Proceedings of the International Ergonomics and the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Joint Congress 2000. (Held August 2000 in San Diego, CA). Santa Moncia, CA: HFES.

10.

Siuru

(2001). Major field test of collision avoidance system underway in Pittsburgh. Mass Transit Magazine. (http://www.masstransitmag.com ) accessed 4/26/02.

11.

Slawinski

E. B.

Hartel

D. M.

Kline

D. W.

(1993). Self-reported hearing problems in daily life throughout adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 8, 552–561.

12.

Stutts

J. C.

Reinfurt

D. W.

Staplin

Rodgman

E. A.

(2001). The Role of Driver Distraction in Traffic Crashes. Technical Report for the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Washington, DC.

13.

Weedon

Hellier

Edworthy

Walters

(2000). Perceived urgency in speech warnings. In the Proceedings of the International Ergonomics and the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Joint Congress 2000. (pp. 3–690 to 3–696). (August 2000 in San Diego, CA). Santa Barbara, CA: HFES.

14.

Wogalter

M. S.

Silver

N. C.

(1990). Arousal strength of signal words. Forensic Reports, 3, 407–420.

15.

Wogalter

M. S.

Silver

N. C.

(1995). Arousal strength of signal words: Connoted strength and understandability by children, elders, and non-native English speakers. Ergonomics, 34, 79–89.

16.

Zobel

G. P.

(1998). Warning tone selection for a reverse parking aid system. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42nd Annual Meeting-1998. (pp. 1242–1246, (October 1998 in Chicago, IL) Santa Barbara, CA: HFES.