Background: Human factor practitioners are sometimes required to provide an immediate answer to an acquisition question, e.g., what is the readability of this monitor? Unfortunately, readability is not listed on the manufacturer's brochure. This study proposes a simple tool to quickly assess the readability of a monitor without the need of conducting a lengthy readability study.
Methods: The text readability of three observers was measured for four colors (red, green, yellow, white), three brightness (.20, .25, .45), at three locations (1.62, 2.38, 3.16 meters) on a 20” color monitor.
Results: The minimum error-free readable font size could be solely determined by the text/background luminance contrast. Thus luminance, not color determined readability. From these results, a MATLAB program was developed that prompts for background and text RGB values and returns the minimal error-free readable font size.
Conclusions: The tool is a fairly robust and quick predictor to assess the readability of a monitor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhumadaA.J. (1996). Simplified vision models for image quality assessment, SID International Digest of Technical Papers, 27, 397–400.
2.
Electronic Industries Assocation (1987a). Contrast measurement of CRT's (TEPAC Publication No. TEP105–10). Arlington, VA: Global Engineering Documents.
3.
Electronic Industries Assocation (1987b). Test method for specular gloss (TEPAC Publication No. TEP105–13). Arlington, VA: Global Engineering Documents.
4.
Electronic Industries Assocation (1987c). Raster response measurement for monochrome cathode ray tubes (TEPAC Publication No. TEP105–08). Arlington, VA: Global Engineering Documents.
5.
Electronic Industries Assocation (1995). Color field uniformity test procedures (TEPAC Publication No. TEP 105–18). Arlington, VA: Global Engineering Documents.
6.
KnoblauchK.ArditiA.SzlykJ. (1991) Effects of chromatic and luminance contrast on reading. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 8(2):428–39.
7.
LeggeG.E.RubinG.S. (1986). Psychophysics of reading. IV. Wavelength effects in normal and low vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A3, 40–51.
8.
LeggeG.E.ParishD.H.LuebkerA.WurmL.H. (1990). Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing luminance and color contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A7, 2002–2010.
9.
ScharffL.V.HillA.AhumadaA.J. (2000). Discriminability measures for predicting readability of text on textured backgrounds, Optics Express, 6(4), 81–90.
10.
Society of Automotive Engineers (1989). Photometric and colorimetric measurement procedures for airborne direct view CRT displays (SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice ARP1782). Warrendale. PA.
11.
Video Electronics Standards Association (2001). Flat panel display measurements standard: Version 2.0. Milpitas, CA: VESA.
12.
William J. Hughes Technical Center (2002). Remote ARTS Color Display (R-ACD) human factors monitor readability assessment quick-look report. ACT-530 Unpublished Report: Atlantic City, New Jersey.
