Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Within the area of navigation displays, the distinction between track-up display and fixed-orientation displays (north-up) has received a lot of attention. Theoretically, this distinction has been linked to different spatial frames of reference. Using alignment effects, recent studies on the role of different reference systems in human spatial memory have identified the important role of environmental and intrinsic reference systems for the cognitive organization of spatial information. In the first experiment of its kind, we tested the effects of alignment of an observer with the visible, local environment and the global, large-scale environment depicted in a You-are-Here type of map display while holding the usually emphasized relation between map orientation and observer orientation constant. Our results show that both alignments have a strong and additive effect on memory performance, suggesting a new and important dimension for the design of spatial information displays such as maps.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aretz

A.J.

(1991). The design of electronic map displays. Human Factors, 33, 85–101.

Evans

G.W.

Pezdek

(1980). Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of real-world distance and location information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 13–24.

Levine

Jankovic

I. N.

Palij

(1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 111, 157–175.

McNamara

T.P.

Rump

Werner

(in press). Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Mou

McNamara

T.P.

(2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 162–170.

Presson

C. C.

Hazelrigg

M. D.

(1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 716–722.

Shelton

A.L.

McNamara

T.P.

(1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102–104.

Shelton

A.L.

McNamara

T.P.

(2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274–310.

Sholl

M.J.

(1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.

10.

Werner

(2001). Role of environmental reference systems in human spatial memory. Poster presented at the 42st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, 15–18 November 2001, Orlando, USA.

11.

Werner

Saade

Lüer

(1998). Relations between the mental representation of extrapersonal space and spatial behavior. In Wender

K.-F.

Freksa

Habel

(Eds.), Spatial Cognition – An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge, LNAI 1404 (108–127). Berlin: Springer.

12.

Werner

Schindler

L.E.

(in prep.). The importance of consistent spatial reference frames in architectural design.

13.

Werner

Schmidt

(1999). Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 447–473.

14.

Wickens

C.D.

(1999). Frames of reference for navigation. In Gopher

Koriat

(Eds.), Attention and Performance XVII, pp. 113–144. Cambridge: MIT press.

Intrinsic Reference Systems in Map Displays

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References