The goal of this study was to assess the usability of portable electronic emergency medical equipment. The study consisted of field interviews conducted with emergency medical workers, including emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, and firefighters. We sampled a varied population, including workers from urban and suburban areas as well as private and public organizations. Equipment manufacturers can use the results of this study to enhance the usability, efficiency, and acceptability of future emergency medical devices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EisenbergM. et al (1980). “Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with rapid defibrillation by emergency medical technicians.” New England Journal of Medicine: 302; 1379–1383.
2.
PageR. et al, (2000). “Use of automated external defibrillators by a US airline.” New England Journal of Medicine: 343: 1210–1216.
3.
StultsK. et al, (1984). “Prehospital defibrillation performed by emergency medical technicians in rural communities.” New England Journal of Medicine: 310; 219–223.
4.
ValenzuelaT. D. et al, (2000). “Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos.” New England Journal of Medicine: 343; 1206–1209.
5.
WeaverW. et al, (1988). “Defibrillation by paramedics and firefighters (comparison), EMT's use of the automatic external defibrillator in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.” New England Journal of Medicine: 319; 661–666.
