Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Impenetrable borders are edges of graphical user interface targets (e.g., buttons, scroll bars) that the mouse cursor cannot cross. Research has shown that targets with impenetrable borders (edge targets) are selected faster than targets without impenetrable borders (non-edge targets). In addition, prior research determined that the effectiveness of impenetrable borders is maximal between .50 and 11.75 cm distance from the cursor's origin to the target. However, this is a broad range and a more specific estimate of distance would be useful for designers wishing to maximize the effectiveness of impenetrable borders. Accordingly, the reported experiment searched for the critical distance where impenetrable border effectiveness asymptotes using a graphical web browser interface. Results indicate that impenetrable border effectiveness asymptotes between .50 cm and 3.50 cm distances. These results support past research and make a more detailed design recommendation. An example of a redesigned interface incorporating impenetrable borders is given.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey

L. L.

Broach

D. M.

Thompson

R. C.

Enos

R. J.

(1999). Controller teamwork evaluation and assessment methodology: (CTEAM): A scenario calibration study. (DOT/FAA/AAM-99/24). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aviation Medicine. Available from: National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161.

Card

S. K.

English

W. K.

Burr

B. J.

(1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601–613.

Card

S. K.

(1982). User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus, Human Factors in Computing Systems, 190–196.

Farris

J. S.

Jones

K. S.

Anders

B. A.

(2001). Acquisition speed with targets on the edge of the screen: An application of Fitts' law to commonly used web browser controls. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 1205–1209.

Fitts

P. M.

(1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the distance of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

Meyer

D. E.

Abrams

R. A.

Kornblum

Wright

C. E.

Smith

J. E. K.

(1988). Optimality in human performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340–370.

Shneiderman

, (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (Third Edition), Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

Tognazzini

(1999). Ask Tog. A quiz designed to give you Fitts. http://www.asktog.com/columns/022DesignedToGiveFitts.html [available 20 February, 2000].

Walker

Smelcer

J. B.

, (1990). A Comparison of selection time from walking and bar menus. CHI 90 Proceedings, 221–225.

10.

Walker

Smelcer

J. B.

Nilsen

(1991). Optimizing speed and accuracy of menu selection: A comparison of walking and pull-down menus. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 871–890.

Using Impenetrable Borders in a Graphical Web Browser: How Does Distance Influence Target Selection Speed?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References