Combining Models to Solve the Problem: Macroergonomics and Public Health

Abstract

Macroergonomic and Public Health approaches were combined with typical ergonomic injury prevention approaches. This combination permitted a thorough investigation of all systems and personnel that might impact on musculoskeletal injuries among U.S. Army students attending Advanced Individual Training as a Combat Medic. The results allowed for an evaluation of the process, the attitudes and beliefs of the cadre (supervisors), and permitted development of a more harmonized, holistic injury prevention program. The results demonstrated success in terms of positive attitudes toward the program, an overall 10.8% reduction in clinic visits for musculoskeletal complaints, a 37% decrease in limited duty days, and a 60% decrease in sprain and strain injuries. A targeted prevention program yielded 36% fewer clinic visits and a 50% reduction in limited duty days. The high level of success achieved by this program was in large part due to the combined processes employed to lay a sound foundation for assessment, design, and evaluation of occupationally based musculoskeletal injuries.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cowan

Jones

Tomlinson

J. P.

(1988). The epidemiology of physical training injuries in U.S. Army infantry trainees: methodology, population, and risk factors. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (Tech Rep. #T4–89).

Grandjean

(1985). Fitting the task to the man: An ergonomic approach (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.

Henderson

N. E.

Knapik

J. J.

Shaffer

S. W.

McKenzie

T. H.

Schneider

G. M.

(2000). Injuries and injury risk factors among men and women in U.S. Army combat medic advanced individual training. Military Medicine, 165, pp. 647–652.

Jones

B. H.

(1983). Overuse injuries of the lower extremities associated with marching jogging, and running: A review. Mil Med, 148, 783–787.

Jones

B. H.

Bovee

M. W.

Harris

J. M.

Cowan

D. N.

(1993). Intrinsic risk factors for exercise-related injuries among male and female Army students. Am J Sports Med, 21, 705–10.

Jones

B. H.

Bovee

M. W.

Knapik

J. J.

(1992). Associations among body composition, physical fitness and injury in men and women Army trainees. In Marriot

B. M.

Grumstrup-Scott

. Body Composition and Physical Performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 141–173.

Kowal

D. M.

(1980). Nature and causes of injuries in women resulting from an endurance training program. Am J Sports Med, 8, pp 265–269

Rice

V. J. B.

Connolly

Bergeron

Mays

M. Z.

Evans-Christopher

G.M.

Allgood

B.D.

Mickelson

(2002). Evaluation of a progressive unit-based running program during advanced individual training. Technical Report No. Aegis T02–1. U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, Ft. Sam Houston, TX. 78234–6125.

Rice

V.J.B.

Mays

M.Z.

Connolly

A comparison of traditional vs. “new” physical training: The rest of the story. In

Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety AC Bitner, Champney

Morrissey

IOS Press: Washington, DC: 2001: 297–303.

10.

Rice

V. J. B.

Pekarek

King

Mickelson

Connolly

(in press). Participatory ergonomics: Determining injury control buy-in of US Army cadre. Work, 18.

11.

U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine. (1996). The association of injury with physical fitness among men and women in gender integrated basic combat training units. Med Surveillance Monthly Rept, 24, pp. 8–12.